Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens

Decision Date11 January 1980
CitationBender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens, 379 So.2d 594 (Ala. 1980)
Parties115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4304 BENDER SHIP REPAIR, INC. v. Charles J. STEVENS, II. 78-359.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

FAULKNER, Justice.

The original opinion in this case is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order permitted by this Court pursuant to Rule 5, ARAP.The circuit court order denying Bender's motion for judgment on the pleadings is reversed.

While employed by Bender under an employment contract terminable at will by either employer or employee, Stevens served on the Mobile County Grand JuryMay 8, 9, 10 and 12.On May 11, during a break of jury service, Stevens contends by affidavit that he was fired, for service on the grand jury.Bender's evidence affidavits reflect that it terminated Stevens' employment on May 31, because he did not report to work after grand jury service.

Stevens sued Bender, alleging breach of employment contract by firing him for serving on the grand jury.Bender's motions to dismiss, for summary judgment, and for judgment on the pleadings were denied.The trial court certified the appealability of the denial of the motion for judgment on the pleadings.This Court granted permission to appeal.

Even though there is a conflict in the reason for termination, the crux of the case is whether an employer may terminate the employment under a terminable at will contract for...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • Carl v. Children's Hosp., 93-CV-1476.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 23 Septiembre 1997
    ...rule which permits an employer to discharge with impunity a 30-year employee one day before his pension vests");6 Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens, 379 So.2d 594 (Ala.1980) (at-will doctrine authorizes dismissal of employee for serving on grand jury);7 Guy v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.,......
  • Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 10 Julio 1987
    ...Mills, Inc., supra, or where an employee had been dismissed because he responded to a subpoena for jury duty, see Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens, 379 So.2d 594 (Ala.1980). The Court continues to adhere to the above-stated principles today. Indeed, in this case, we are not asked to abro......
  • Helen West v. Roadway Express, Inc.
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 21 Abril 1982
    ... ... (1968), 209 Va. 460, 164 S.E ... 2d 645; Bender Ship Repair v. Stephens (Ala., 1980), ... 379 So. 2d 594; ... ...
  • Adler v. American Standard Corp.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 16 Julio 1981
    ...rigidly adhering to the rule that an employer's motivation for discharging an at will employee is irrelevant. See Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens, 379 So.2d 594 (Ala.1980); Segal v. Arrow Industries Corp., 364 So.2d 89 (Fla.App.1978); Georgia Power Co. v. Busbin, 242 Ga. 612, 250 S.E.2d......
  • Get Started for Free