Bender v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. of North Carolina
Decision Date | 23 September 1931 |
Docket Number | 103. |
Citation | 160 S.E. 352,201 N.C. 355 |
Parties | BENDER v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Warren County; Cranmer, Judge.
Action by Anna B. Bender against the American Telephone & Telegraph Company of North Carolina. From a judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
The judgment of the court below is as follows:
The plaintiff excepted and assigned errors for "that the complaint stated a good cause of action against defendant both in respect of the fraud and the trespass alleged therein, and that there was no admission or finding of fact which warranted the judgment."
Pittman Bridgers & Hicks, of Henderson, for appellant.
Julius Banzet, Jr., of Warrenton, for appellee.
The court held: adjudged that the action be dismissed.
We think the judgment of the court below correct.
In Avery County Bank v. Smith, 186 N.C. at page 641 120 S.E. 215, 219, it is said: "Where the registration of an instrument is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Yount v. Lowe
...Gas Co. v. Day, 249 N.C. 482, 106 S.E.2d 678 (1959); Borders v. Yarbrough, 237 N.C. 540, 75 S.E.2d 541 (1953); Bender v. Tel. Co., 201 N.C. 355, 160 S.E. 352 (1931). In rendering an adversary judgment, the jurisdiction of the court is restricted to the matters presented in the pleadings, bu......
-
Knowles v. Wallace
...showing that either of the defendants J. H. Rehder or J. H. Wallace had any interest in the land in controversy. In Bender v. Tel. Co., 201 N.C. 355, 356, 160 S.E. 352, quoting from Avery County Bank v. Smith, 186 635, at page 641, 120 S.E. 215, citing numerous authorities, is the following......