Benjamin v. Board of Election Com'rs
| Decision Date | 19 March 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-408,84-408 |
| Citation | 122 Ill.App.3d 693,78 Ill.Dec. 507,462 N.E.2d 626 |
| Parties | , 78 Ill.Dec. 507 Homer A. BENJAMIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS and Tomas G. Bissonnette, Respondents- Appellees. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Homer A. Benjamin, pro se.
Nancy L. Kaszak, and Michael Levinson, Chicago, for respondents-appellees.
Petitioner, Homer A. Benjamin, appeals from an order of the circuit court affirming the decision of defendant Board of Election Commissioners (the "Board") not to cause petitioner's name to be printed on the ballot for the primary election for Democratic Party committeeman for the 46th Ward in Chicago. Initially we note that petitioner's main brief is devoid of citation to legal authority and contains no legal argument, and we would accordingly be justified in dismissing this appeal. (87 Ill.2d R. 341(e)(7); 47th and State Currency Exchange, Inc. v. B. Coleman Corp. (1977), 56 Ill.App.3d 229, 232-33, 13 Ill.Dec. 577, 371 N.E.2d 294.) Nonetheless, we declined to do so and have considered the issues raised. Following oral arguments, we entered an order affirming the trial court with an opinion to follow. The pertinent facts are hereafter set forth.
Petitioner filed his nominating papers with the Board on December 12, 1983. The nominating petition contained 1,833 signatures. On December 30, 1983, respondent Tomas Bissonnette filed objections to the nominating petition on the ground that over 700 of the signatures were invalid. The Board convened a hearing on the objector's petition on January 3, 1984, which was continued, according to respondents' brief, to allow for a precinct binder check to determine the validity of the objections to the signatures. No transcript from this hearing appears in the record. After the binder check was completed, petitioner was allowed to submit index cards with the names of signers to be checked against a master file. Petitioner failed to submit any names.
The hearing was resumed on January 17, 1984. The hearing officer indicated that the minimum number of signatures required was 1,379. At no time did petitioner object to this requirement on any ground. The nominating papers, as already indicated, contained 1,833 signatures. As a result of the binder check, objections to 599 signatures were sustained, primarily on the basis that the signer did not live in the ward or at the indicated address.
Petitioner, called as a witness on the hearing officer's motion, failed to present any evidence tending to show the validity of the signatures which had been struck. He did not produce any affidavits from signatories nor did he call any witnesses to testify that they were registered voters in the 46th Ward and had signed his petition. On the hearing officer's motion, a Board employee, Mr. Kikulski, testified that 117 binder cards had not been available for the binder check, and that these cards reflected new registrations occurring on or before the date petitioner's nominating papers were filed, December 12, 1983. The hearing was continued until the next day.
On January 18, 1984, petitioner presented several index cards to the hearing officer after the latter had granted additional time for a master file check. The hearing officer recommended that several signatures which had previously been determined invalid be reinstated. Nonetheless, the nominating petition remained about 138 signatures short of the required number. According to the testimony of the only other witness to appear at the hearing, Allison Tallard, who is also a Board employee, the total of binder cards and change of address cards which was unavailable for the binder check was 124. The hearing officer noted that even if all of these people had signed the nominating petition and all of their signatures had been erroneously disqualified by the Board for failing to appear in the binder check, petitioner would still have failed to tender the required number of valid signatures. The Board adopted the hearing officer's recommendation and sustained the objections and declared the petition not valid. Petitioner sought review in the circuit court which affirmed the decision of the Board. He then appealed to this court. This court heard the matter on an expedited schedule and after oral argument and due consideration of the record and briefs, announced our decision to affirm the circuit court. At that time we indicated that a written opinion would subsequently be issued to explain the reasons for our decision. This is that opinion.
OpinionSection 10-4 of the Election Code provides that:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bd. of Educ. of Du Page High Sch. Dist. 88 v. Pollastrini
...signatures on the petition were not valid. Id. at 366, 120 Ill.Dec. 388, 523 N.E.2d 1299. In Benjamin v. Board of Election Commissioners, 122 Ill.App.3d 693, 78 Ill.Dec. 507, 462 N.E.2d 626 (1984), the appellate court stated that “[w]hether a person is a registered voter and whether he or s......
-
Cinkus v. Village of Stickney
...review "applies equally to issues involving constitutional due process rights"); Benjamin v. Board of Election Commissioners, 122 Ill.App.3d 693, 696-97, 78 Ill.Dec. 507, 462 N.E.2d 626 (1984) (holding that constitutional argument was procedurally defaulted for failure to present it to In h......
-
Lenehan v. Twp. Officers Electoral Bd. of Schaumburg Twp.
...Electoral Board, 407 Ill.App.3d 1004, 1005, 349 Ill.Dec. 23, 945 N.E.2d 1175 (2011); Benjamin v. Board of Election Commissioners, 122 Ill.App.3d 693, 695, 78 Ill.Dec. 507, 462 N.E.2d 626 (1984); Stout v. Black, 8 Ill.App.3d 167, 168 n. 1, 289 N.E.2d 456 (1972). ¶ 192030292466;0028;;LQ;ILSTC......
-
Azeez v. Fairman
...Falls Exempted Village Schools Bd. of Educ., 521 F.2d 1329, 1333-34 (6th Cir.1975); Benjamin v. Board of Election Comm'rs, 122 Ill.App.3d 693, 697, 78 Ill.Dec. 507, 462 N.E.2d 626, 628 (1984), especially when as in this case there arguably was contrary authority--some of it at the court of ......