Benjamin v. Madison Med. Build. Cond. Board of Managers
Decision Date | 15 October 2009 |
Docket Number | 602220/06.,1180. |
Citation | 66 A.D.3d 510,2009 NY Slip Op 7339,887 N.Y.S.2d 55 |
Parties | MAURICE J. BENJAMIN, Respondent, v. MADISON MEDICAL BUILDING CONDOMINIUM BOARD OF MANAGERS et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Plaintiff, a dentist, seeks to enforce the express right of first refusal of Aline Realty LLC, of which he is the managing member, to purchase the basement unit of the 12-floor condominium at 161 Madison Avenue, which primarily houses medical practices. Defendant, a reproductive endocrinologist, maintains his practice in a unit on the fourth floor of the building.
Defendant Board of Managers is the governing body of the condominium, and is charged with enforcement of its bylaws. Article XI, section 1 of those bylaws spells out the right of first refusal in relevant part as follows: "A unit owner has the right to sell or lease his Unit providing he gives notice of the bona fide terms of any proposed sale or lease to the immediately contiguous Unit Owners and to the Board of Managers and obtains their approval for the sale or lease . . . If an immediately contiguous Unit Owner(s) disapproves of the transaction, such Unit Owner(s) must give the selling or leasing Unit Owner and the Board of Managers written notice thirty (30) days after notice of the proposed sale or lease, of his intention to purchase or lease the Unit on the same terms, or other terms more favorable to the Owner of the Unit proposed for sale or lease." Article XI, section 3 sets forth the required notice of the bona fide terms of a sale, to be given to a holder of a right of first refusal: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
544 W. 157th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Alliance Prop. Mgmt. & Dev., Inc., Index No. 104203/2012
...hands, and estoppel do not apply. Garber v. Stevens, 94 A.D.3d 426, 427-28 (1st Dep't 2012); Benjamin v. Madison Med. Bldg. Condominium Bd. of Mgrs, 66 A.D.3d 510, 511-12 (1st Dep't 2009). Second, even if an equitable defense were applicable, defendant has not pointed to, nor does the court......
- People v. Miranda