Bennett v. Taylor
Decision Date | 09 May 1932 |
Docket Number | 295 |
Parties | BENNETT v. TAYLOR |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Logan Chancery Court, Northern District; C. M. Wofford Judge; affirmed.
Affirmed.
George M. Bennett and Evans & Evans, for appellant.
Rhyne & Shaw and Sam Rorex, for appellee.
The American Bank & Trust Company, a banking corporation doing business in the town of Paris, entered into a written lease contract by which it leased a certain building in said town for a term of ten years, the lessor to make certain improvements and the lessee to pay a yearly rental of $ 1,620 at $ 135 per month. The improvements were made according to the agreement, and the bank entered on the property and occupied the same, paying the rental as stipulated for about five years, when it became insolvent and was taken over by the State Bank Commissioner for liquidation. For about a year the deputy bank commissioner in charge of the liquidation occupied the premises and paid the rent at the rate of $ 135 per month, until the first day of May, 1931, at which time, acting under instructions from the banking department, he notified the appellant, the executrix of the lessor (then deceased) of his intention to abandon the premises unless she would accept a rental of $ 35 per month. Upon her refusal to do this, he notified her of his intention to vacate, and advertised for sale the bank fixtures which had been installed in the building by the bank. The appellant thereupon brought this suit, denying the right of the Bank Commissioner to cancel the lease, and prayed for an order restraining the sale of the fixtures until the full rental for the ten-year period had been paid, and claimed a vault door as a fixture to the freehold.
A temporary restraining order was granted until the cause could be heard, and upon a hearing thereof the court found (1) that the appellant had no lien upon the fixtures; (2) that the appellee, if he found the lease burdensome to the bankrupt estate, had the right, within a reasonable time, to terminate the same; (3) that the appellant had not been damaged by appellee in vacating the premises; (4) that she was entitled to the rent at the contract price for the month of May, 1931 (5) that the appellant was entitled to a reasonable rent since June 1, 1931, upon which proof might be taken; and (6) that the vault door affixed by the appellee is personalty like other bank fixtures, and may be removed.
This appeal is from a decree setting aside and vacating the temporary restraining order and dismissing the petition.
The appellant states that To sustain this contention, learned counsel calls attention to the provision in § 719 of Crawford & Moses' Digest, to the effect that the title of the State Bank Commissioner to, and his right of, possession of insolvent bank assets shall be subject to any and all equities in favor of third persons which have arisen or have been obtained as against said property or assets prior to the taking charge thereof by the said commissioner, and to the holding in the case of Funk v. Young, 138 Ark. 38, 210 S.W. 143, 5 A. L. R. 79, that the Bank Commissioner is not an innocent purchaser in taking possession of the assets of an insolvent bank, but takes them subject to the equities against the bank. He also relies on the landlord's prerogative of distraint by which at common law the landlord may seize all chattels found on the demised premises for rent in arrears. It is insisted that this common-law rule is in force in this State by reason of the provisions of § 1432 of Crawford & Moses' Digest, by which the common law, so far as the same is applicable and of a general nature, shall be the rule of decision in this State unless repealed by the General Assembly and not inconsistent with the Constitution of this State or of the United States.
Learned counsel for the appellant concede this rule has never been invoked or applied in this State, but that, not having been changed by statute, it still exists, for the reason that it is not at all incompatible with our institution. We cannot assent to this conclusion for the very reason that, throughout nearly a hundred years of the history of this State, no court or Legislature has ever recognized the harsh and oppressive remedies of the landlord's common-law right of distraint, and, in the absence of a statutory direction, we are unwilling now to revive and apply that doctrine. It is a matter of common knowledge that the tenant class of this State are among the poorest and most helpless of our citizens, and, in the absence of a statute or contract authorizing it, we decline to say that a landlord may seize and dispose of the poor...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. White, 4-5626.
...504, 10 S.W.2d 898; Sessoms v. Ballard, 160 Ark. 146, 254 S.W. 446; Cameron v. Robbins, 141 Ark. 607, 218 S.W. 173; Bennett v. Taylor, 185 Ark. 794, 795, 49 S.W.2d 608; Witherspoon v. Nickels, 27 Ark. 332; Cantley v. Edens, 190 Ark. 445, 79 S.W.2d 280; Austin v. Federal Land Bank, 188 Ark. ......
-
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. White
... ... 504, 10 S.W.2d 898; Sessoms v. Ballard, 160 ... Ark. 146, 254 S.W. 446; Cameron v. Robbins, ... 141 Ark. 607, 218 S.W. 173; Bennett v ... Taylor, 185 Ark. 794, 49 S.W.2d 608; ... Witherspoon v. Nickels, 27 Ark. 332; ... Cantley v. Edens, 190 Ark. 445, 79 S.W.2d ... 280; ... ...
-
Halbert v. Helena-West Helena Indus. Development Corp.
...254 S.W. 446; Barnes v. Jeffus, 173 Ark. 100, 291 S.W. 990; Bank of Mulberry v. Hawkins, 178 Ark. 504, 10 S.W.2d 898; Bennett v. Taylor, 185 Ark. 794, 49 S.W.2d 608; and Romich v. Kempner Bros. Realty Co., 192 Ark. 454, 92 S.W.2d But as a part of appellants' complaint, there was a copy of t......
-
In re Hot Shots Burgers & Fries, Inc., Bankruptcy No. 91-41298M.
...129 S.W. at 545. Courts applying Arkansas law have uniformly allowed trade fixtures to be removed from real property. Bennett v. Taylor, 185 Ark. 794, 49 S.W.2d 608 (1932); Bank of Mulberry v. Hawkins, 178 Ark. 504, 10 S.W.2d 898 (1928); Field v. Morris, 95 Ark. 268, 129 S.W. 543 In this ca......