Bentrim v. Bentrim

Decision Date16 April 1984
Docket NumberNo. 0216,0216
Citation282 S.C. 333,318 S.E.2d 131
CourtSouth Carolina Court of Appeals
PartiesGlenn D. BENTRIM, Respondent, v. Patricia Ann BENTRIM, Appellant. . Heard

Ronald F. Barbare of Lathan, Smith & Barbare, Greenville, for appellant.

H. Samuel Stilwell of Ashmore, Stilwell & Hunter, Greenville, for respondent.

SHAW, Judge.

This is an action for child support arrearages and attorney fees. The Family Court Judge awarded no amount for the alleged arrearages and ordered $400 in attorney's fees to be paid by the respondent-Mr. Bentrim to the appellant-Mrs. Bentrim. We affirm.

After a fourteen year marriage which produced three children [ages fifteen (15), twelve (12), and ten (10) at the time of the trial in August of 1981], the parties separated in June of 1979. A Nevada divorce was obtained in January of 1980. Pursuant to the divorce decree, Mrs. Bentrim received custody of the children and child support of $200 per month per child.

In the summer of 1980, the parties entered into a private agreement whereby Mr. Bentrim received custody of the oldest child and assumed the support obligation therefor. Mrs. Bentrim's child support was reduced proportionately.

Mr. Bentrim initiated this action to obtain visitation privileges with his other two children. Mrs. Bentrim counterclaimed for an increase in child support, child support arrearages, alimony, and attorney's fees. She claims that $600 is owed in child support arrearages, not counting $255 received from Mr. Bentrim used to send one child to camp. Mr. Bentrim counts the $255 as child support; the remaining $345 balance was not paid because of the expenses Mr. Bentrim incurred in getting the oldest child relocated when Mrs. Bentrim refused to send the child's personal effects to Kentucky where Mr. Bentrim lives.

The trial judge awarded Mr. Bentrim visitation rights at his home during the summer and at Christmas and visitation privileges in South Carolina upon reasonable notice. Mrs. Bentrim received an increase in child support of $50 per month per child and attorney's fees of $400 because she prevailed on the child support issue; no child support arrearages were awarded because the amount owed was offset by the expenses Mr. Bentrim incurred in obtaining custody of the oldest child; no alimony was awarded but the issue was left open for a future determination if necessary.

Mrs. Bentrim appealed from every ruling made by the trial judge. However, in the interim between the trial and this appeal, all of the issues have become moot or have been abandoned by Mrs. Bentrim with the exception of the child support arrearages and attorney fees.

This being an equity case decided by the trial judge without reference to a master or referee, we decide the issues in keeping with our view of the preponderance of evidence. Bugg v. Bugg, 277 S.C. 270, 286 S.E.2d 135 (1982).

In her exception to the trial judge's ruling concerning arrearages, Mrs. Bentrim states that the amount of the arrearages is $345. Her contention that the $255 used for camp expenses is not child support is not embodied in that or any other of her exceptions. Having failed to raise this issue in an exception, Mrs. Bentrim has thus waived it. Simmons v. Ciba-Geigy Corporation, 279 S.C. 26, 302 S.E.2d 17 (1983); Reid v. Hardware Mutual Ins. Co., 252 S.C. 339, 166 S.E.2d 317 (1969); Peoples National...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Williamson v. Middleton
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 2007
    ...fees, there are six factors to be considered. See, e.g., Wood v. Wood, 269 S.C. 600, 239 S.E.2d 315 (1977); Bentrim v. Bentrim, 282 S.C. 333, 318 S.E.2d 131 (Ct.App.1984). Consideration should be given to all six criteria in establishing reasonable attorney's fees; none of these six factors......
  • Barr v. Barr
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 17, 1985
    ...v. Nienow, 268 S.C. 161, 232 S.E.2d 504 (1977) (failure to argue issue in brief deemed abandonment of exception); Bentrim v. Bentrim, 282 S.C. 333, 318 S.E.2d 131 (Ct.App.1984) (failure to raise issue in an exception constitutes waiver). See Supreme Court Rule 8, Section 2 and Supreme Court......
  • Matheson v. Bolt
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 23, 2008
    ... ... An ... award of child support and attorney's fees rests within ... the sound discretion of the trial Judge. Bentrim v ... Bentrim, 282 S.C. 333, 335-36, 318 S.E.2d 131, 133 (Ct ... App. 1984). An abuse of discretion occurs when the decision ... ...
  • Baron Data Systems, Inc. v. Loter
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 7, 1988
    ...fees, there are six factors to be considered. See, e.g., Wood v. Wood, 269 S.C. 600, 239 S.E.2d 315 (1977); Bentrim v. Bentrim, 282 S.C. 333, 318 S.E.2d 131 (App.1984). Consideration should be given to all six criteria in establishing reasonable attorney's fees; none of these six factors is......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT