Berde v. N. Shore–Long Island Jewish Health Sys., Inc.

Decision Date12 September 2012
Citation950 N.Y.S.2d 737,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 06117,98 A.D.3d 932
PartiesVirginia Phylis BERDE, Appellant, v. NORTH SHORE–LONG ISLAND JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., etc., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

98 A.D.3d 932
950 N.Y.S.2d 737
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 06117

Virginia Phylis BERDE, Appellant,
v.
NORTH SHORE–LONG ISLAND JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., etc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Sept. 12, 2012.



Pamela A. Elisofon, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Barry Elisofon of counsel), for appellant.

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven M. Swirsky and Kevin R. Brady of counsel), for respondent.


MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ARIEL E. BELEN, PLUMMER E. LOTT, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for unlawful termination of employment in violation of Labor Law § 740, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated November 30, 2010, which granted the defendant's motion, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint as abandoned.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings before a different Justice.

The plaintiff commenced the instant action, inter alia, to recover damages for unlawful termination of employment pursuant to Labor Law § 740. In January 2006 the plaintiff filed a note of issue. In an order entered June 26, 2006, the Supreme Court, among other things, granted the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the case was marked “disposed.” The plaintiff appealed from that order.

[950 N.Y.S.2d 738]

In a decision and order dated April 15, 2008, this Court determined that the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see Berde v. North Shore–Long Is. Jewish Health Sys., Inc., 50 A.D.3d 834, 855 N.Y.S.2d 656). The records of the Nassau County Clerk indicate that it received the decision and order dated April 15, 2008, on May 13, 2008. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 30, 2008, the defendant's motion, inter alia, for leave to reargue the appeal was denied.

In April 2010, after making inquiries to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, as to the status of the case, the plaintiff's counsel personally obtained a copy of this Court's decision and order dated April 15, 2008, and filed it in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which restored the action to the trial calendar. On July 15, 2010, the defendant moved, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint as abandoned. In the order appealed from, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Bradley v. Konakanchi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 17, 2017
    ...Second Departments' consistently narrow construction of CPLR 3404 (see generally Berde v. North Shore–Long Is. Jewish Health Sys., Inc., 98 A.D.3d 932, 933, 950 N.Y.S.2d 737 [2d Dept.2012]156 A.D.3d 190"Where a case is not marked off or stricken from the trial calendar, but is removed from ......
  • Buczek v. Dell & Little, LLP
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 29, 2015
    ...since the case was not “marked off or stricken from the trial calendar” (Berde v. North Shore–Long Is. Jewish Health Sys., Inc., 98 A.D.3d 932, 933, 950 N.Y.S.2d 737 ). Accordingly, the defendants established, prima facie, that the plaintiffs were likely to have succeeded on appeal in the u......
  • Baumgardner v. Baumgardner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 12, 2012
    ...Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, awarding sole ownership of the defendant's retirement account [98 A.D.3d 932]to the defendant ( see DeSouza–Brown v. Brown, 71 A.D.3d at 946, 897 N.Y.S.2d...
  • GreenPoint Mortg. Funding v. Ehrenthal
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 22, 2022
    ...removed from the calendar for another reason, CPLR §3404 does not apply" (Berde v North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc., 3 98 A.D.3d 932 [2d Dept 2012]; see also Santana v Vargas, 77 A.D.3d 648 [2d Dept 2010]). Accordingly, Plaintiff was not required to demonstrate the existenc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT