Berg v. Town of Oyster Bay
Decision Date | 09 December 2002 |
Citation | 300 A.D.2d 330,752 N.Y.S.2d 58 |
Parties | MICHAEL BERG et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>TOWN OF OYSTER BAY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim some two years after the claim arose.
In determining whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, a court should consider (1) whether the municipality acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days from its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter, (2) whether the claimant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the delay in filing a notice of claim, and (3) whether the delay would substantially prejudice the municipality in maintaining its defense on the merits (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Rabanar v City of Yonkers, 290 AD2d 428; Matter of Resto v City of New York, 240 AD2d 499). Furthermore, the "infancy of the injured [appellant], standing alone, [does] not compel the granting of an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim" (Knightner v City of New York, 269 AD2d 397). If the reason for failure to timely file the notice of claim is infancy, then it is incumbent upon the claimant to demonstrate a nexus between the delay and the infancy. In this case, the appellants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the lengthy delay, or that there was a nexus between the infancy of the appellant and the delay (see Knightner v City of New York; supra; Matter of Cuffee v City of New York, 255 AD2d 440).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In The Matter Of The Claim Of Brian Rivera v. Nuhealth
...alone, does not compel the granting of an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. See Berg v. Town of Oyster Bay, 300 A.D.2d 330, 752 N.Y.S.2d 58 (2d Dept 2006). However, the absence of a causal nexus between the petitioner's infancy and the delay in serving the notice of cla......
- Bernabel v. Perullo