Berks County v. Reading City Passenger Railway Co.

Decision Date25 March 1895
Docket Number265
Citation167 Pa. 102,31 A. 474
PartiesBerks County v. Reading City Passenger Railway Co. & Reading Traction Co., Appellants
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued March 7, 1895

Modified, April 8, 1895, 167 Pa. 102 at 117.

Appeal No. 265, Jan. T., 1895, by defendants, from decree of C.P Berks Co., 1894, No. 606, in favor of plaintiff on bill in equity. Decree modified.

Bill in equity to restrain a street railway company from constructing its tracks upon a bridge.

The facts appear in the following opinion of the court below by ENDLICH, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

"1. The Penn Street Pass. Ry. Co. was incorporated by act April 3, 1873, P.L. (1874) 346, with power to construct a single or double track road on Penn street, in the city of Reading from the Harrisburg bridge on the west to Nineteenth street on the east.

"The Reading City Passenger Railway Company was incorporated by act, December 18, 1873, P.L. (1874), 463, with power to occupy with its main tracks and specified branch tracks certain other streets in said city. The former company was subsequently merged in the latter, which, on March 16, 1893, filed an acceptance of the provisions of the act May 14, 1889, P.L. 211, under section 20 thereof, received letters patent, dated March 17, 1893, as provided therein, and on April 1, 1893, leased its rights, privileges, property and franchises for the period of 99 years to the Reading Traction Company, incorporated March 9, 1893, under act March 22, 1887, P.L. 8.

"2. On December 18, 1893, the directors of the Reading City Passenger Railway Company, which then had a double track road on Penn street, down to the foot of the eastern approach of the Harrisburg bridge, nearly midway between Front and Second streets, and a single track (unused and unprovided with appliances necessary for the use of trolley cars) running up said approach to the point where the iron structure of the bridge begins, resolved to construct an 'extension, beginning at the intersection of Front and Penn streets, thence by double track, westward on the line of Penn street, crossing the Harrisburg bridge to the western bank of the Schuylkill river,' and authorized the officers of the company to take all steps necessary to carry said resolution into effect. A copy of the minutes reciting this action was, on the same day, recorded in the office of the recorder of this county, and an exemplification of said record filed December 27, 1893, in the office of the secretary of the commonwealth.

"3. On the day last mentioned, the Reading City Passenger Railway Company and the Reading Traction Company, and the then county commissioners of the county of Berks, executed the following instrument:

"Articles of agreement made and entered into this twenty-seventh day of December, A.D. one thousand eight hundred and ninety-three, between the county of Berks, in the state of Pennsylvania, of the first part, and the Reading City Passenger Railway Company and the Reading Traction Company, corporations existing under the laws of Pennsylvania and located in the city of Reading, in the county of Berks, of the second part, each party covenanting for itself, its successors and assigns, with the other party, its successors and assigns.

"Whereas, the public convenience requires the extension of street railways beyond the limits of the city of Reading; and

"Whereas, to reach the townships adjoining and lying to the west of the city, it is necessary to cross the county bridge at the foot of Penn street, known as the Harrisburg bridge; and,

"Whereas, the parties of the second part are duly authorized to extend their line on Penn street to the west bank of the Schuylkill river;

"Now therefore this agreement witnesseth: First. That the consent and right to lay a double track of iron or steel rails upon and across the said bridge and the approaches thereto, and to string electric wires along the top of said bridge within the spans thereof, and upon span wires to be supported by neat wooden poles upon the eastern approach thereof, and by ornamental wooden poles upon the western approach thereof, be and are hereby granted by the county of Berks to the Reading City Passenger Railway Company and the Reading Traction Company, to be used by their cars, propelled by electricity or any other motive power other than by locomotive.

"Second. That the rails to be laid on said bridge shall be of the standard tram bridge rail pattern, and the gauge thereof shall be five feet two and one half inches.

"Third. The cars of the parties of the second part shall not have the right of way in crossing said bridge in preference to any vehicle, animal or thing which may be rightfully upon the same track or moving in the same direction, and shall not at any time be propelled at a greater speed than at the rate of four miles an hour, nor shall more than one car or train of cars be upon the bridge at onetime.

"Fourth. That nothing in this grant or contract contained shall be construed or taken to obligate the county of Berks to maintain said bridge for the use of the parties to whom this grant is made, or for the purpose to which this contract relates, nor to render the county liable for any injury to person or property resulting directly or indirectly from the use of said bridge for the purpose covered by this agreement.

"Fifth. And in consideration of the grant aforesaid, the said Reading City Passenger Railway Company and the Reading Traction Company, or either of them, shall pay to the county of Berks the sum of $600, annually, in quarterly payments of $150 each, said sum or sums to be applied to keeping the said bridge in repair, the said payments to begin the first quarter after the completion of the tracks upon said bridge, and to continue as long as the cars of the said parties or either of them shall run across or over the said bridge; and the failure to run the cars thereon, for the convenience of passengers, for any period of three consecutive months, shall be taken as an abandonment of the line and a surrender of the right herein granted, and this agreement shall thereupon become void and of no effect.

"Sixth. This grant to be void unless the right is exercised within one year from the date hereof.

"In witness whereof, the commissioners of the county of Berks have hereunto set their hands and affixed the seal of the county of Berks, and the presidents and secretaries of the parties of the second part have hereunto set their hands and affixed the corporate seals respectively of the Reading City Passenger Railway Company and the Reading Traction Company on the day and year first above written.

"4. By resolution approved January 16, 1895, the councils of the city of Reading consented to the extension of its tracks by the Reading City Passenger Railway Company over said bridge, the limits of said city extending to the western bank of the Schuylkill river.

"5. At a distance of about one block from the western extremity of the Harrisburg bridge there is an unincorporated settlement known as West Reading, containing 800 to 1000 inhabitants, a hat factory, grist mill, carriage factory, several brick yards, stores, etc., and waterworks with about 150 consumers. Many of the employees in the industries referred to reside in the city of Reading. The extension of a railway from the said city to this settlement would be a convenience to such employees as well as to the persons residing in the settlement. The space intervening between the same and the Harrisburg bridge consists, upon the one side of the highway, of filled-up ground claimed by the P. & R.R.R. Co., and upon the other bluff, known as Leinback's Hill, of a solid mass of rock. [The extension of the Reading City Passenger Railway Company's road to the western extremity of the Harrisburg bridge only, can be of no material advantage or service to the persons residing or laboring in West Reading or points beyond.]

"6. By letters patent, dated March 10, 1894, the Reading & Womelsdorf Electric Railway Co. was incorporated, to construct an electric railway from the western bank of the Schuylkill river, at a point opposite the city of Reading, where the Harrisburg bridge crosses the said river, westwardly upon the Dauphin turnpike, passing through part of West Reading and ending at Womelsdorf. Contracts for the equipment and construction of said road by June 1, 1895, have been made; if and when this road is constructed it is the intention of the defendants to connect their tracks with the same. [But as yet the consent of all of the local authorities of not a single township through which the Reading & Womelsdorf road must pass, has been obtained for its construction.]

"7. In April, 1894, the county commissioners being about to lay a new floor upon the Harrisburg bridge, the president of the Reading Traction Company, by letter of April 10, 1894, addressed to the said commissioners, invited them to confer with him concerning the kind of rail to be laid by the company upon the bridge, the method of adjusting the same to the new flooring, etc. [The commissioners made no response to this letter, and a desire, orally expressed by said president to one of the commissioners about the same time, to meet the commissioners concerning the matters referred to, was refused, with the statement that the commissioners had nothing to do with the Traction Company and the latter had no business on the bridge.]

"8. During the night of November 28-29, 1894, the officers of the defendant companies, knowing that the county repudiated the agreement of December 27, 1893, and anticipating an attempt on its part to apply for an injunction if they proceeded in daytime, went with their employees upon Harrisburg bridge with rails and appliances for laying them and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Gehringer v. Lehigh County
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • May 1, 1911
    ... ... 7; Clulow v. McClelland, ... 151 Pa. 583; Berks County v. Reading City Pass. Ry ... Co., 167 Pa. 102; ... ...
  • Beaver County v. Beaver Valley Traction Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • January 3, 1911
    ... ... Water Co. v. Pittsburg, 226 Pa. 624; Berks County v ... Reading City Pass. Ry. Co., 167 Pa. 102 ... by the court: Berks County v. Reading City Passenger Ry ... Co., 167 Pa. 102; Larue v. Oil City Ry. Co., ... railway company and that which is appropriated by the ... ...
  • Northwestern Pennsylvania Railway Co. v. Crawford County Commissioners
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 31, 1922
    ...be amicably exercised by terms agreed upon, or, failing to agree, compulsorily determined by a proceeding in court: Berks County v. Reading City, etc., Cos., 167 Pa. 102, 119; New Street Bridge Co. v. Public Service Commission, 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 6, 11; Beaver County v. C. D. & P. Teleg. C......
  • Reading City Pass. Ry. Co. v. Berks County
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1914
    ...it without the consent of the county; but that consent could not have been arbitrarily withheld from them: Berks County v. Reading City Passenger Railway Company, et al., 167 Pa. 102. terms upon which they had the right to use it became a matter of agreement, in the first instance, between ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT