Berkshire Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. State, 33476
| Decision Date | 13 August 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 33477,No. 33478,No. 33476,33476,33477,33478 |
| Citation | 9 A.D.2d 555,189 N.Y.S.2d 333 |
| Parties | BERKSHIRE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. Claim Daniel Walter BRONSON, an infant, by Harry M. Bronson, his guardian ad litem, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. Claim Harry M. BRONSON, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. Claim |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Charles D. Campbell, Potsdam, for claimant-appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., for respondent (Jerome Lefkowitz, New York City, of counsel).
Before BERGAN, J. P., and COON, GIBSON, HERLIHY and REYNOLDS, JJ.
Appeal by the appellants from judgments of the Court of Claims dismissing the claims.
On August 5, 1955, Harry M. Bronson was the owner of an automobile and the claimant Berkshire Mutual Fire Insurance Company was subrogated to his rights as the result of payments under a comprehensive liability policy. Daniel Walter Bronson, the son of Harry, was riding as a passenger at the time of the accident. While claimants were proceeding along Route 56 in a southerly direction and in the vicinity of Hannawa Falls, a limb fell from a tree on the westerly side of the highway landing on the automobile and causing the personal injuries and property damage for which recoveries are sought herein. There is no charge of contributory negligence as to any of the claimants.
The trial court found that there was no evidence that the State had actual or constructive notice of the condition of the limb prior to its fall. There was testimony that at the time of the accident it was raining and windy. Witnesses produced by the claimant, including a tree expert, testified that an observation of the tree would not indicate that it was in a dangerous condition. Another witness testified that he was greatly surprised that the limb blew off because from the ground it appeared to be sound; that he had parked his car in the vicinity of the tree and the limb on many occasions. From this testimony and from a reading of the record in its entirety, we conclude that there was no evidence of actual or constructive notice but to the contrary that there was evidence--leaves on the tree and limb--that it was a live tree. The record shows that prior to the accident 'pruners' had examined the tree on behalf of the State but they were not produced and did not testify at the time of the trial.
The facts and circumstances here are clearly...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McGinn v. City of Omaha
...See, also, Harris v. Vil of East Hills, 41 N.Y.2d 446, 362 N.E.2d 243, 393 N.Y.S.2d 691 (1977); Berkshire Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 9 A.D.2d 555, 189 N.Y.S.2d 333 (1959). The evidence in the present case shows that the tree was a large silver maple estimated to be between 35 ......
-
McKeen v. Tisch, Docket No. 201783
...v. State, 654 So.2d 311, 315 (La., 1995); Commonwealth v. Callebs, 381 S.W.2d 623, 624 (Ky., 1964); Berkshire Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. State, 9 A.D.2d 555, 555-556, 189 N.Y.S.2d 333 (1959); but see Comba v. Town of Ridgefield, 177 Conn. 268, 270-273, 413 A.2d 859 As with these other jurisdic......
-
Jay v. State
...notice of the hollow and dangerous condition of the tree prior to the accident]; Berkshire Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. State of New York , 9 A.D.2d 555, 555-556, 189 N.Y.S.2d 333 [3d Dept. 1959] [There was no evidence of actual or constructive notice of the condition of the tree prior to the acci......
-
Feely v. City of St. Louis, 66158
...See, Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, 104 Ariz. 513, 456 P.2d 371 (1969), and Berkshire Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 9 A.D.2d 555, 189 N.Y.S.2d 333 (1959); Pietz v. City of Oskaloosa, 250 Iowa 374, 92 N.W.2d 577 (Iowa 1958). While not binding, all of these......