Bernstein v. Freudman

Decision Date23 April 1985
Citation489 N.Y.S.2d 467,64 N.Y.2d 1044
Parties, 478 N.E.2d 983 David W. BERNSTEIN, et al., Respondents, v. Victor FREUDMAN, et al., Appellants,
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (102 A.D.2d 805, 477 N.Y.S.2d 340).

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and KANE *, JJ., concur.

ALEXANDER, J., took no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Rieger v. 303 East 37 Owners Corp., 2007 NY Slip Op 31618(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 6/7/2007), 0102456/2005.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 7, 2007
    ...1984) ("Defendants' broad and conclusory assertions are insufficient to withstand plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment") aff'd 64 N.Y.2d 1044 (1985); S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 338, 342 (1974) (bald, conclusory assertions, "even if believable," are insu......
  • Bernstein v. Freudman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 21, 1988
    ...to a formula set forth in the contract. In Bernstein v. Freudman, 102 A.D.2d 805, 477 N.Y.S.2d 340 (1984), aff'd. 64 N.Y.2d 1044, 489 N.Y.S.2d 467, 478 N.E.2d 983 (1985), this Court upheld the right of the plaintiffs to receive compensation for the sale of Joint The present controversy aris......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT