Bew v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 28 February 1921 |
Docket Number | No. 47.,47. |
Parties | BEW v. TRAVELERS' INS. CO. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Action by Marie F. Bew against the Travelers' Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
This was an action at law in the Supreme Court tried at the Atlantic circuit before the court without a jury, and resulted in a nonsuit, upon which judgment was accordingly entered in the Supreme Court. In granting the nonsuit, Judge Donges, who presided, delivered the following opinion:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri State Life Insurance Co. v. Martin
...passenger only. Upon an examination of the cases cited, we find those most nearly sustaining the contention are Bew v. Travelers' Ins. Co.; Travelers' Co. v. Peek, and Meredith v. Bus. Men's Acc. Co., supra. In the first mentioned case the applicable clause is as follows: "The insurance her......
-
Flanders v. Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees
... ... aeronautics" within the meaning of the exception clause ... in the policy sued on. State ex rel. Security Mutual Life ... Ins. Co. v. Allen, 305 Mo. 607, 267 S.W. 379; Arms ... v. Faszholz et al. (Ft. Dearborn Casualty Underwriters of ... Chicago, Ill., garnishee), 32 ... 252 S.W. 976; Long v. St. Joseph Life Ins. Co., 248 ... S.W. 923; Wendorff v. Mo. State Life Ins. Co., 318 ... Mo. 363, 1 S.W.2d 99; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Peake, ... 82 Fla. 128, l. c. 130. (2) The insured was engaged in ... aeronautics, within the meaning of the policy, at the time he ... ...
-
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman
...the author of the language should have employed some other expression, such as "participating in," used in Bew v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 95 N.J.Law, 533, 112 A. 859, 14 A.L.R. 983, Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Peake, 82 Fla. 128, 89 So. 418, and Meredith v. Business Men's Acc. Ass'n of America, 213......
-
Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada v. Kiester
...that 'participation' might refer to a single transaction or flight, whereas 'engaging' did not do so. See Bew v. Travelers Ins. Co., 95 N.J.L. 533, 112 A. 859, 14 A.L.R. 983; Pittman v. Lamar Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 17 F.2d 370; Gibbs v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States, 256 N.Y. ......