Flanders v. Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees
Decision Date | 03 November 1931 |
Citation | 42 S.W.2d 973,226 Mo.App. 143 |
Parties | DELBERT H. FLANDERS, APPELLANT v. BENEFIT ASSOCIATION OF RAILWAY EMPLOYES, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis--Hon. Claude O. Pearcy, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Henry W. Blodgett, Charles Straub, Meyer Hessel and George J Schlueter for appellant.
(1) The trial court erred in finding for respondent and in giving the declarations of law offered by respondent, and in refusing to give the declarations of law offered by appellant, in that the court in so doing held that the insured, although he was not in any way employed in connection with aeronautics, and at the time he received his injuries was taking a single isolated ride in an aeroplane, was thereby "engaged in aeronautics" within the meaning of the exception clause in the policy sued on. State ex rel. Security Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Allen, 305 Mo. 607, 267 S.W. 379; Arms v. Faszholz et al. (Ft. Dearborn Casualty Underwriters of Chicago, Ill., garnishee), 32 S.W.2d 781; Peters v Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 233 N.Y.S. 500; Masonic Accident Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 164 N.E. 628; Benefit Assn. of Railway Employes v. Hayden, 299 S.W. 995; Head v. New York Life Ins. Co., 43 F.2d 517; Price v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 124 So. 817; Charette v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 232 N.W. 848; Gits v. New York Life Ins. Co., 32 F.2d 7; Cooper v. National Life Ins. Co. of U. S. of America, 253 S.W. 465. (2) The trial court erred in failing to assess in favor of appellant ten per cent damages for vexatious refusal to pay and to allow a reasonable attorney's fee, in that the facts were agreed that the insured, at the time he received the injuries which resulted in his death, was not in any way connected with airplanes or aviation, and was merely taking a short, single, isolated ride in an airplane. Under such circumstances the defense that the insured was "engaged in aeronautics" was not such a defense as might be reasonably interposed by respondent in view of the numerous adjudicated cases on the same question, and on the interpretation of the words "engaged in." Rogers v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 139 S.W. 265, 157 Mo.App. 671; Gibson v. Pioneer Life Ins. Co., 168 S.W. 818, 181 Mo.App. 302; Exchange Bank of Novinger v. Turner, 14 S.W.2d 425.
Gillespie & Dempsey for respondent.
(1) The phrase "engaged in aeronautics" in this policy must receive a reasonable interpretation consonant with the apparent object and plain intent of the parties. Meredith v. Business Men's Acc. Ins. Assn., 213 Mo.App. 688, 252 S.W. 976; Long v. St. Joseph Life Ins. Co., 248 S.W. 923; Wendorff v. Mo. State Life Ins. Co., 318 Mo. 363, 1 S.W.2d 99; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Peake, 82 Fla. 128, l. c. 130. (2) The insured was engaged in aeronautics, within the meaning of the policy, at the time he sustained the injuries which resulted in his death, and there is therefore no liability under the policy. Long v. St. Joseph Life Ins. Co., 225 S.W. 106; Meredith v. Business Men's Acc. Ins. Assn., 213 Mo.App. 688, 252 S.W. 976, l. c. 978; Long v. St. Joseph Life Ins. Co., 248 S.W. 923; Wendorff v. Mo. State Life Ins. Co., 318 Mo. 363, 1 S.W.2d 99; Mackey v. Commonwealth Casualty Co., 34 S.W.2d 564; Cochran v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co., 219 Mo.App. 322, 271 S.W. 1011; Masonic Acc. Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 147 N.E. 156; Bew v. Travelers Ins. Co. (N. J.), 95 N.J.L. 533, 112 A. 859, 14 A. L. R. 983; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Peake, 82 Fla. 128, 89 So. 415; Fleckenstein v. Fleckenstein, 66 N.J.Eq. 252, l. c. 256; Green v. National Casualty Co., 87 Wash. 237; People v. Corbalis, 86 A.D. 531; Dellehay v. Hickey, 71 S.W. 1; Hess v. Preferred Masonic Acc. Assn., 40 L.R.A. 444, l. c. 449; Wilkinson v. Travelers Inc. Co. (Tex.), 72 S.W. 1016; Kennedy v. Maryland Casualty Co., 26 F.2d 501. (3) Respondent had a right to interpose this defense here, and under these cicrumstances there is no vexatious delay. Cooper v. Nat'l Life Ins. Co. of U. S. A., 212 Mo.App. 266, l. c. 279, 253 S.W. 465.
--Plaintiff, who is appellant here, brought this suit against the Benefit Association of Railway Employes, to recover on an insurance policy issued by defendant to a son of plaintiff, who sustained injuries through the fall of an airplane in which he was riding, resulting in death.
The questions presented for our determination on appeal do not necessitate any particular reference to the pleadings.
The case was tried to the court without the aid of a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.
The case was tried upon the following agreed stipulation of facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.
... ... Armstrong Cork Co., 250 Mo. 733, 157 S.W ... 618; Flanders v. Benefit Assn., 226 Mo.App. 143, 42 ... S.W.2d 974; State v. Phillips ... handled by an employee or employees of the Corporation Trust ... Company. Meetings of stockholders are held ... ...
-
State ex rel. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Hughes
... ... v. Shain, 344 Mo ... 276, 126 S.W.2d 181; State ex rel. Mut. Benefit Assn. v ... Shain, 334 Mo. 920, 68 S.W.2d 685. (3) In overruling ... Employers' ... Liability Assur. Corp., 248 N.Y.S. 587; Flanders v ... Benefit Assn. of Ry. Employees, 226 Mo.App. 143, 42 ... S.W.2d ... ...
-
Missouri State Life Insurance Co. v. Martin
... ... 846; 69 A. L ... R. 331; 83 A. L. R. 384, and to the case of Benefit ... Ass'n v. Hayden, 175 Ark. 565, 299 S.W ... 995. In their brief ... air"; and, in Flanders v. Benefit ... Ass'n, 226 Mo.App. 143, 42 S.W.2d 973, the court ... Ass'n R. R. Employees v. Hayden, 175 Ark ... 565, 299 S.W. 995, 57 A. L. R. 622, and ... ...
-
Groves v. Aegerter
... ... assignment of the partnership property for the benefit of ... creditors was involved. It was held that the surviving ... surviving partner the same employees as were in the employ of ... the partnership, until April 1, 1926. During ... ...