Bier v. Gehee

Decision Date13 March 1893
Docket NumberNo. 1,254,1,254
Citation148 U.S. 137,13 S.Ct. 580,37 L.Ed. 397
PartiesBIER v. McGEHEE
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Statement by Mr. Justice BROWN:

This was a motion to dismiss a writ of error upon the ground that no federal question was involved.

Suit was begun by a petition filed by McGehee in the civil district court of the parish of Orleans, December 10, 1889, setting forth that in May, 1888, petitioner had purchased of defendant, Bier, a certain state bond numbered 788, 'denominated and represented to be a consolidated bond of the state of Louisiana,' for the sum of $1,000, issued January 1, 1874, under authority of Act No. 3 of the state legislature of 1874; that, after the purchase of said bond and payment therefor, it was claimed by the state of Lousisiana, through the attorney general, as its property, and that it had been stolen by one Burke from the state treasurer, and the return of said bond, with $60 received in payment of the coupons attached thereto, was demanded by the attorney general. The petitioner further averred that the bond was purchased by him under the full belief that Bier was the lawful owner thereof, but that he was not at the time of the sale by him, or since, the owner thereof, and that he had good reason to believe and so charged that the bond was then the lawful property of the state of Louisiana, and part of the Agricultural and Mechanical College fund held by the state; that said bond was worthless in his hands; that the defendant refused to repay the purchase price. He prayed for a judgment rescinding the sale of the bond, and that the defendant be condemned to take back the same, and return the amount paid therefor.

Defendant, in his supplemental answer, denied that he was ever the holder of the bond, or that he had ever sold the same to the plaintiff; and averred that he had never purchased or acquired any such bond that was not acquired in good faith, in open market, before maturity, in the due and regular course of trade, as commercial paper; and that any law of the state of Louisiana supposed to affect or alter the contract contained in the consolidated bonds of the state, issued under the act of 1874, was repugnant to the constitution of the United States.

Upon the trial it was proved, and not denied by Bier, that he had purchased the bond after the adoption of the constitu- tion of the state in 1879. The state treasurer's report of 1879 was put in evidence to show that the state was the owners of the bond at that time. The court decreed that the sale of the bond be rescinded, and that the defendant, Bier, be compelled to take back the bond, with the coupons attached, and the sum of $60, received for the coupons paid in error, etc. Defendant appealed to the court of appeals of the parish of Orleans, which affirmed the judgment, and thereupon he sued out a writ of error, from this court, which defendant in error, McGehee, moved to dismiss.

F. L. Richardson, for the motion.

H. L. Lazarus, opposed.

Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error invokes the jurisdiction of this court upon the ground that article 233 of the constitution of the state of Louisiana, which declared that the consolidated bonds of the state, held for the Agricultural and Mechanical College and the Louisiana Seminary fund, were null and void, was repugnant to section 10, art. 1, of the constitution of the United States, prohibiting states from passing laws impairing the obligation of contracts.

The article in question declares the debt due by the state to the Agricultural and Mechanical fund to be $182,313.03, being the proceeds of the sales of lands and land scrip granted by the United States to the state for the use of a college for the benefit of agriculture and the mechanical arts; directs that said amounts shall be placed to the credit of said fund on the books of the auditor and treasurer as a perpetual loan; that the state shall pay an annual interest of 5 per cent. on said amount from January 1, 1880, for the use of said college; and that the consolidated bonds of the state, then held by the state for the use of said fund, were to be null and void after January 1, 1880, 'and the general assembly shall never make any provision for their payment, and they shall be destroyed in such manner as the general...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Wagoner v. Gainer, 14827
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 15 juin 1981
    ...W.Va. Code § 5-10-22 (1979 Replacement Vol.). See, Campbell v. Kelly, 157 W.Va. 453, 202 S.E.2d 369, 373 (1974); Bier v. McGehee, 148 U.S. 137, 13 S.Ct. 580, 37 L.Ed. 397 (1893); New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Light Co., 115 U.S. 650, 6 S.Ct. 252, 29 L.Ed. 516 (1885); Railroad Co. v. McCl......
  • State ex inf. McKittrick v. Bode
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 25 février 1938
    ... ... Westhues v ... Sullivan, 283 Mo. 546, 224 S.W. 327; State v ... Hickman, 9 Mont. 370, 23 P. 743; State v ... Weston, 4 Neb. 218; Bier v. McGehee, 148 U.S ... 137, 37 L.Ed. 398; New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Louisiana ... L. & H. Producing & Mfg. Co., 115 U.S. 650, 29 L.Ed ... ...
  • U.S. v. Murrie
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 27 avril 1976
  • State ex Inf. Mckittrick v. Bode, 35873.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 25 février 1938
    ...Westhues v. Sullivan, 283 Mo. 546, 224 S.W. 327; State v. Hickman, 9 Mont. 370, 23 Pac. 743; State v. Weston, 4 Neb. 218; Bier v. McGehee, 148 U.S. 137, 37 L. Ed. 398; New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Louisiana L. & H. Producing & Mfg. Co., 115 U.S. 650, 29 L. Ed. 524; Gunn v. Barry, 82 U.S. 610......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT