Bigley v. Lawrence, 57162
| Decision Date | 08 March 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 57162,57162 |
| Citation | 253 S.E.2d 870,149 Ga.App. 249 |
| Parties | BIGLEY et al. v. LAWRENCE et al. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Edward E. Boshears, Brunswick, for appellants.
Reid W. Harris, Brunswick, for appellees.
On October 5, 1976, appellees, the Lawrences, filed a complaint seeking to enjoin appellants from foreclosing upon certain real property. The trial court granted a temporary restraining order and issued a rule nisi for a hearing on the interlocutory injunction on October 7, 1976. The clerk of the court issued a summons, but there is nothing in the record to indicate that a copy of the complaint and the rule nisi were ever served upon appellant. However, in October, 1977, appellants filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. On February 22, 1978, the trial court entered a default judgment restraining appellants from proceeding with the foreclosure and ordering them to mark the deeds to secure debt in question "satisfied." This appeal is brought from the denial of appellants' motion to open the default.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting a default judgment to the appellees when there was no proof of service in the record and in failing to grant appellants' motion to open the default.
It is a long standing rule of law that where the record discloses that a defendant was never served with a copy of the complaint and summons attached thereto, and if the defendant has not either waived service or made a general appearance in the case, there is no valid suit pending in the trial court and the trial court does not acquire personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Larsen v. Larsen, 224 Ga. 112, 160 S.E.2d 383 (1968). However, any act by which one consents to the jurisdiction of the court constitutes a waiver. Jones v. Roberts Marble Co., 90 Ga.App. 830, 84 S.E.2d 469 (1954). A consent judgment extending a temporary restraining order is sufficient to constitute a waiver. Moss v. Bishop, 235 Ga. 616, 221 S.E.2d 38 (1975), as is an objection to interrogatories, Sorrells v. Cole, 111 Ga.App. 136, 141 S.E.2d 193 (1965), and a general demurrer, Hatcher v. Ga. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co., 112 Ga.App. 711, 146 S.E.2d 535 (1965). Therefore, where appellant files a motion for summary judgment based upon the merits of the case, he has made a general appearance and waived any defects in the service of the complaint.
Under Code Ann. § 81A-112(a), a defendant's answer...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thorburn Co. v. ALLIED MEDIA OF GEORGIA
...Plumlee v. Davis, 221 Ga.App. 848, 473 S.E.2d 510 (1996); Stamps v. Bank South, supra at 409, 471 S.E.2d 323; Bigley v. Lawrence, 149 Ga.App. 249, 250, 253 S.E.2d 870 (1979). Accordingly, any judgment entered thereon is void. Lee v. G.A.C. Finance Corp., 130 Ga. App. 44, 45(4), 202 S.E.2d 2......
-
Hamm v. Willis, A91A0726
...jury trial sub judice. (We note that no exception was taken to the trial court's ruling on appellees' motion.) In Bigley v. Lawrence, 149 Ga.App. 249, 253 S.E.2d 870 (1979), the appellees filed suit in October 1976 but service was never perfected. A year later appellants filed a motion for ......
-
HAP Farms, Inc. v. Heard
...in waiver of service, and "any act by which one consents to the jurisdiction of the court constitutes a waiver." Bigley v. Lawrence, 149 Ga.App. 249, 250, 253 S.E.2d 870. In this case, Phillips and Powell in essence entered a general appearance. They posed no timely objection either to bein......
-
Roberts v. Bienert
...of service of process, he has made a general appearance and thereby waived any alleged defect in the service. Bigley v. Lawrence, 149 Ga.App. 249, 250, 253 S.E.2d 870 (1979). In his answer appellee had raised not only the defenses pertaining to lack of proper service but also those addresse......