Billings v. Fairbanks
Decision Date | 03 March 1885 |
Citation | 139 Mass. 66,29 N.E. 544 |
Parties | Charles A. Billings v. Jacob H. Fairbanks[3] |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Exceptions sustained.
G. A Torrey, for the defendant.
F. A Gaskill & H. B. Verry, for the plaintiff.
OPINION
This is an action for slander, which has been before this court already. 136 Mass. 177. The case for the plaintiff as presented at the second trial, after the decision cited, so far as material, was in brief as follows: On February 21, 1882, the plaintiff and one Leonard Foster went to the defendant's house. While the plaintiff was out of the room, Foster said to the defendant that the plaintiff had been charged with taking the defendant's money, asked him various particulars as to his mode of keeping his money, and whether he had any proof that the plaintiff took it. The defendant replied, that he knew he took it, the books showed it. Foster said that he should demand proof; to which the defendant made an angry answer, adding, "You'll back him, will you?" Then the plaintiff came in and told the defendant that he had accused the plaintiff of stealing his money; which the defendant denied, but then said that he knew the plaintiff took it, "and another man knows it too." Foster asked the defendant if he had any proof of it. He said, "No doubt of it; the books show it, and I can see it in the plaintiff's eye." The defendant also said, at some time during the interview, "I have no doubt he took the money," as averred in the declaration. This statement in the plaintiff's presence is the first slander relied on.
On February 27, the plaintiff, with one Frank L. Fairbanks, a nephew of the defendant, again went to the defendant's house. The plaintiff, as before, told the defendant that he had accused the plaintiff of stealing the money, which the defendant again denied. Fairbanks then told the defendant that he thought the plaintiff's position was right, and asked him if he had any proof. The defendant answered, "I know he took the money, but I can't prove it." This is the second slander relied on. In the course of the interview, the defendant showed Fairbanks his books, and how he kept his cash, and how careful he had been not to have any mistake with it.
We assume, in favor of the plaintiff, that there was evidence tending to show that the defendant did not fully believe the plaintiff guilty at the time of these talks, although that may be questionable. There is no evidence that he did not suspect him. The court ruled that the talks were privileged, and that, unless express malice was proved, the plaintiff could not recover, and further instructed the jury as follows:
After the jury had been out two hours, they submitted the following inquiry in writing to the court: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Petition of Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.
...will. It has long been recognized that an absence of good faith may tend to prove ill will and thus actual malice. See Billings v. Fairbanks, 139 Mass. 66, 69, 29 N.E. 544; Christopher v. Akin, 214 Mass. 332, 334, 101 N.E. 971, 46 L.R.A.,N.S., 104; Wormwood v. Lee, 226 Mass. 339, 341, 115 N......
-
Aku v. Lewis
...App.Div. 838, 180 N.Y.S. 671 (1920) and Fresh v. Cutter, 73 Md. 87, 20 A. 774 (1890), present employer of suspect; Billings v. Fairbanks, 139 Mass. 66, 29 N.E. 544 (1885), suspect himself and his associates.See also Restatement (Third) of Torts, § 595, comment f and § 598, comment e.15 Toog......
-
Riley v. Stone
... ... What ... was said by the defendant, and imputed to him as slander, was ... privileged, not absolute, but qualified ( Billings v ... Fairbanks, 139 Mass. 66, 29 N.E. 544), and the defendant ... is protected by this privilege, provided he used it without ... malice ... ...
-
Craig v. Proctor
...Am. Dec. 345;Golderman v. Stearns, 7 Gray, 181, 182;Fitzgerald v. Robinson, 112 Mass. 371;Adams v. Stone, 131 Mass. 433;Billings v. Fairbanks, 139 Mass. 66, 29 N. E. 544;Morasse v. Brochu, 151 Mass. 567, 25 N. E. 74,8 L. R. A. 524, 21 Am St. Rep. 474;Doyle v. Kirby, 184 Mass. 409, 68 N. E. ......