Billman v. McPherson, 34547

Decision Date23 November 1955
Docket NumberNo. 34547,34547
Citation130 N.E.2d 342,164 Ohio St. 296
Parties, 58 O.O. 72 BILLMAN et al., Appellees, v. McPHERSON et al., Appellants.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County.

Ernest R. Genovese, Akron, for appellants.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C. J., and MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Furry
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 5 de agosto de 1971
  • Schlagheck v. Winterfeld
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 29 de dezembro de 1958
  • Town of Hartland v. Jensen's, Inc.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 3 de novembro de 1959
    ...309 N.Y. 866, 131 N.E.2d 284; Davis v. McPherson, Ohio App., 132 N.E.2d 626, appeals dismissed 164 Ohio St. 375, 130 N.E.2d 794; 164 Ohio St. 296, 130 N.E.2d 342. It is true that the town must rely upon the authority given by the statute, which confers the power to regulate but not, in thos......
  • Curtiss v. City of Cleveland
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 16 de dezembro de 1959
    ...differently than it had been restricted by the original 1929 zoning ordinance. On appeal to the Court of Appeals on law and fact, 130 N.E.2d 342, that court denied relief to those who had not asked for it and to those whose properties had not been substantially improved for business purpose......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT