Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 92-2077
| Decision Date | 09 March 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-2077,92-2077 |
| Citation | 615 So.2d 241 |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D678 Bradley BIRNBAUM, Appellant, v. Brigette BIRNBAUM, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Edwards & Angell and Gary Woodfield, Palm Beach, Peggy Rowe-Linn, Klein & Walsh, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Tralins & Associates and Arlene C. Richman, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
Bradley and Brigitte Birnbaum were married in the Virgin Islands in June 1990. They have one child, born in 1990 in New York. The child lived with both his parents in New York until the parties separated. The wife left New York with the minor child in October 1991, and has lived in Florida since that date.
On April 20, 1992, the wife filed a petition in Dade County for dissolution of marriage, equitable distribution of the parties' property, and custody of the parties' child, along with a verified motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order. The husband was served with the petition in New York in May 1992. On June 16, 1992, the husband filed a notice of special appearance and motion to dismiss the petition for dissolution for lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction, and to vacate or dissolve the temporary restraining order. The husband argued that the trial court should not hear the case because the wife took the child from New York without his consent. The husband appeals the order denying his motion to divest the trial court of jurisdiction.
Under the "divisible divorce" concept, a dissolution proceeding has two separable aspects, that which relates to the marital res and that which relates to the property rights and obligations of the parties. While constructive service is sufficient for an adjudication of the former, personal jurisdiction is generally required for a determination of the latter. Davis v. Dieujuste, 496 So.2d 806 (Fla.1986).
In order for the trial court to have jurisdiction to dissolve a marriage, one of the parties to the marriage must reside six months in the state before the filing of the petition. Sec. 61.021, Fla.Stat. (1991). Additionally, the party must plead that the marriage is irretrievably broken. Sec. 61.052, Fla.Stat. (1991). A party may initiate this proceeding against a person residing out of the state. Sec. 61.061, Fla.Stat. (1991). Here, the wife attested to these facts. Thus, the trial court correctly determined it had subject matter jurisdiction over the dissolution proceeding.
Florida courts have jurisdiction and are competent to decide custody matters if Florida is the home state of the child at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, or Florida has been the child's home state within six months before the commencement of the proceeding. Sec. 61.1308(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991). See Feriole v. Feriole, 468 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). It is undisputed, and the wife attested to the fact that since she left New York with the minor child in October 1991, the child has resided in Florida. Thus, as a threshold matter, the jurisdictional requirements of sections 61.1302-61.1348, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), were met.
The husband argues that in light of the wife's behavior in leaving New York with the child, the trial court violated the UCCJA in determining it had subject matter jurisdiction to decide the custody issue. This is not the case. Section 61.1318, entitled, "Jurisdiction declined by reason of conduct" provides:
(1) If the petitioner for an initial decree has wrongfully taken the child from another state or has engaged in similar reprehensible conduct, the court may decline to exercise jurisdiction if this is just and proper under the circumstances.
That section goes on to state:
(2) Unless required in the interest of the child, the court shall not exercise its jurisdiction to modify a custody decree of another state if the petitioner,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Orbe v. Orbe
...property disputes and questions of support and equitable distribution. Sorrells v. Sorrells, 82 So.2d 684 (Fla.1995); Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So.2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, 208 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 207 So.2d 453 (Fla.1967). But if the court has perso......
-
Gonzalez v. Gonzalez
...of the UCCJA is whether Florida is the "home state" 2 of the child. See Sec. 61.1308(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So.2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (finding that trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over a child custody determination where Florida had been the child'......
-
Wendler v. City of St. Augustine
...of subject matter jurisdiction is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review.” 825 So.2d at 482 (citing Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So.2d 241, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (“[T]he trial court did not abuse its discretion or authority in concluding it was vested with subject matter jurisdi......
-
Munnerlyn v. Wingster, 5D01-2925.
...court's determination of subject matter jurisdiction is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review. See Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So.2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The father argues that the trial court possessed subject matter jurisdiction over the instant paternity suit because the ......
-
Alternative dispute resolution and settlement
...parents, a parent, or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months). [§61.514(1)(a), Fla. Stat.; Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)(Florida was child’s home state where wife separated from husband in New York, brought child to Florida, and waited six ......
-
Jurisdiction and venue
...set up residence in another state, they effectively abandoned Florida for purposes of long arm statute).] CASES • Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Where parties maintained a marital residence in Florida for three years before filing, followed by a move to foreign sta......
-
Long-arm jurisdiction in support and divorce actions: the unwary beware.
...2d 284 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1986); Brophy v. Brophy, 3 FLA. L. WEEKLY SUPP. 58 (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct., March 3, 1995). (22) Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1993); Shammay v. Shammay, 491 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1986); Pasquini v. Pasquini, 2 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 255 (Fla. 12......