Bishop v. Ransom
| Decision Date | 31 January 1867 |
| Citation | 39 Mo. 416 |
| Parties | ROBERT C. BISHOP, Defendant in Error, v. WILLYS C. RANSOM, Plaintiff in Error. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Error to Kansas City Common Pleas Court.
J. D. Hines, for plaintiff in error.
Douglass & Gage, and Ewing & Smith, for defendant in error.
This cause was submitted at the last term of this court, but reserved upon a motion for rehearing. The simple ground assumed by the motion is, that no motion for a new trial was made in the court below. An examination of the bill of exceptions proves the assumption to be correct. The error complained of is really matter of exception, and can only be reviewed here after an unsuccessful motion for a new trial. The cases of State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400; Bateson v. Clark, 37 Mo. 31, and State to use, &c. v. Matson et al., 38 Mo 489, are referred to as settling all the questions that can arise in this case.
The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
The other judges concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Knisely v. Leathe
...or for a new trial or in arrest of judgment before they can be considered by the appellate court. Banks v. Landis, 39 Mo. 406; Bishop v. Ransom, 39 Mo. 416; Collins Saunders, 46 Mo. 389; Harris v. Harris, 145 Mo. 622; Williams v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 485; R. S. 1909, secs. 2029-2031; Atchison ......
-
Butler v. Lawson
...Railroad Co., 44 Mo. 420; Bruce v. Vogel, 38 Mo. 104. Willard P. Hall for respondents. 1. A motion for a new trial was necessary. Bishop v. Ransom, 39 Mo. 416; Bateson v. Clark, 37 Mo. 31; Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. Co. v. Clark, 68 Mo. 374; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19. 2. The executor of......
-
Reed v. Peper Tobacco Warehouse Co.
...1 B. & P. 3; Chitty on Con. (10th Am. ed.) 730; Daly v. Timon, 47 Mo. 516; Western Boatmen's Savings Assn. v. Kribben, 48 Mo. 37; Bishop v. Ransom, 39 Mo. 416; Long v. Towl, 41 Mo. 398; Morgner v. Kister, 42 Mo. 466; Hannibal & St. Jo. R. R. Co. v. Mahoney, 42 Mo. 467; Collins v. Saunders, ......
-
Woods v. Stephens
...Mo. 207; Marsh v. Richards, 29 Mo. 99; Helm v. Wilson, 4 Mo. 41; Little v. Mercer, 9 Mo. 218; Gen. Stat. 1865, pp. 683-4, § § 1-6; Bishop v. Ransom, 39 Mo. 416; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400; Bailey v. Chapman, 41 Mo. 536; Moses v. Bierling et al, 31 N. Y. 462.BLISS, Judge, delivered the op......