Bitterman v. Grotyohann
| Decision Date | 10 June 2002 |
| Citation | 295 A.D.2d 383,743 N.Y.S.2d 167 |
| Parties | ROSE BITTERMAN, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>CHARLES GROTYOHANN, Respondent, et al., Defendant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant homeowners satisfied their initial burden on their motion for summary judgment by demonstrating that any determination as to what caused the plaintiff to fall from their front steps would be based on speculation (see Bernstein v City of New York, 69 NY2d 1020; Teplitskaya v 3096 Owners Corp., 289 AD2d 477). They presented expert evidence that the steps and handrails conformed to the applicable provisions of the New York City Building Code and that they did not breach their duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition (see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233).
The evidence offered by the plaintiff in opposition was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiff testified at her deposition that she did not know what caused her to fall, and she did not notice any defect on the front steps. The plaintiff offered expert evidence that the height differential of the concrete steps and the length of the handrails failed to conform to the applicable provisions of the New York City Building Code. However, a determination that these alleged defects, rather than a misstep or loss of balance, were a proximate cause of the plaintiff's accident would be based on sheer speculation (see Jefferson v Temco Servs. Indus., 272 AD2d 196; see also Conry v Avellino, 287 AD2d 478).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
DeEscobar v. Westland S. Shore Mall, L.P.
... ... Hestia Greek Rest. Inc., 4 A.D.3d 189, 772N.Y.S.2d 59 ... [1st Dept 2004]; Bitterman v Grotyoham, 295 A.D.2d ... 383, 743 N.Y.S.2d 167 [2d Dept 2002]; Rizzi v Y.S.G.F ... Realty, LLC, supra) ... ...
-
Sussman v. MK LCP Rye LLC, Index No.: 156066/2014
...Lissauer v. Shaarei Halacha, Inc., 37 A.D.3d 427 [2d Dept 2007]; Birman v. Birman, 8 A.D.3d 219 [2d Dept. 2004]; Bitterman v. Grotyohann, 295 A.D.2d 383 [2d Dept 2002]). As addressed above, Plaintiff identified the site of his fall and his experts' identification of a defective condition at......
-
Seitz v. TJX Cos.
...would be based on speculation ( see Bernstein v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 1020, 517 N.Y.S.2d 908, 511 N.E.2d 52;Bitterman v. Grotyohann, 295 A.D.2d 383, 743 N.Y.S.2d 167;Teplitskaya v. 3096 Owners Corp., 289 A.D.2d 477, 735 N.Y.S.2d 585). Also, the plaintiff did not present sufficient ev......
-
Igbodudu-Edwards v. Bd. of Managers of the Parkchester N. Condo., Inc.
...fell, avoiding her injury ( see Ridolfi v. Williams, 49 A.D.3d 295, 296, 853 N.Y.S.2d 56 [1st Dept. 2008];Bitterman v. Grotyohann, 295 A.D.2d 383, 384, 743 N.Y.S.2d 167 [2d Dept. 2002] ). Finally, the expert's conclusion that “[t]here was no handrail or other handhold within arm's reach to ......