Bivins v. State

Decision Date12 March 1969
Docket NumberNo. 41749,41749
Citation440 S.W.2d 312
PartiesWalter BIVINS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Jones, Blakeslee, Minton, Burton & Fitzgerald, by Roy Minton, Austin, for appellant.

Tom Blackwell, Dist. Atty., Austin, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug; the punishment, 4 years, probated.

Appellant was jointly charged and tried with his co-defendant Michael Nus, Jr., and presents the same ground for reversal which we overruled in Nus v. State, Tex.Cr.App. 440 S.W.2d 310, this day decided.

The judgment is affirmed.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.

ONION, Judge (concurring).

For the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Gaston v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 297, this day decided, I concur in the results reached.

MORRISON, J., joins in this concurrence.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Kemp v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 9, 1970
    ...Gaston v. State, supra; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 308; Nus v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 310; Bivins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 312. Testimony of Police Officer Bynum, one of the affiants, heard by the trial court in the jury's absence prior to the admission of th......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 12, 1969
    ...Court of the United States has denied certiorari in Gomez v. Beto, 394 U.S. 936, 89 S.Ct. 1217, 22 L.Ed.2d 469. See also Bivins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 312 (delivered March 12, 1969); Gaston v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 297 (delivered March 12, 1969; and Nus v. State, Tex.Cr.......
  • Hendrix' Estate v. Hendrix
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 27, 1969
    ... ... That would be from about April sometime, 1965,' ... and 'at all times subsequent to that' grantor 'was in a very bad state' ...         Under this state of the evidence an instructed verdict was not authorized. See Cole v. Waite, 151 Tex. 175, 246 S.W.2d 849, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT