Black Roofing Inc. v. West

Decision Date06 August 1998
Docket NumberNo. 98CA0176,98CA0176
Parties98 CJ C.A.R. 4251 BLACK ROOFING INC. and Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, Petitioners, v. April D. WEST and the Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, Respondents. . V
CourtColorado Court of Appeals

Curt Kriksciun, Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, Denver, for Petitioners.

Marlin W. Burke, Denver, for Respondent April D. West.

No Appearance for Respondent Industrial Claim Appeals Office.

Opinion by Judge VOGT.

In this workers' compensation proceeding, Black Roofing, Inc. (employer), and its insurer, Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, seek review of the final order issued by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) awarding temporary total disability (TTD) benefits to April D. West (claimant). We affirm.

Claimant sustained a compensable injury to her lower back in June 1996, while shoveling rock for employer. She received medical treatment and returned to modified employment with restrictions, which were subsequently removed. On July 23, 1996, employer terminated claimant for drinking on the job and for unexcused absences.

Thereafter, claimant did not work. Her condition grew more painful and she obtained a second medical opinion in September 1996. The physician whom she consulted diagnosed right sciatica with possible radiculopathy and a possible herniated nucleus pulposus. He also noted that claimant's symptoms appeared consistent with her prior symptomatology and that her condition "looks to be a continuation of her work injury." When claimant's initial treating physician saw her in November 1996, he concurred with the second physician's diagnosis, but disagreed that claimant's condition was related to her work injury.

In February 1997, claimant obtained an examination by a division-appointed independent medical examiner (IME). The IME noted that, subsequent to her initial work injury, claimant had sustained injuries in a car accident and as a result of a beating, but concluded that these events did not affect her lower back injury and that her condition was related to the June 1996 work injury.

After an evidentiary hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that employer had failed to overcome the IME's determination that claimant's condition was causally related to her industrial accident. The ALJ also found that claimant was not offered modified employment consistent with her work restrictions during the period between her injury and her termination. The ALJ therefore determined that claimant was entitled to TTD benefits.

The Panel upheld the award of TTD benefits on review. It concluded that the record supported the ALJ's determination that claimant's back problems were a compensable component of her industrial injury, and that the ALJ reasonably could infer that the disability resulting from the industrial injury contributed to some degree to claimant's subsequent unemployment.

Employer and the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority contend that the Panel erred in awarding TTD benefits, primarily...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Matter of Miller v. Source One Management, W. C. No. 4-418-173 (Colo. 12/19/2003)
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 19, 2003
    ...treatment" is not one of the statutory grounds for terminating TTD benefits, and the ALJ erred in treating it as such. Cf. Black Roofing Inc. v. West, 967 P.2d 195 (award of TTD benefits may not be conditioned on claimant's willingness to conduct a job The presence or absence of active medi......
  • Colorado Springs Disposal v. INDUST. CLAIM, No. 01CA0464.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • March 28, 2002
    ...only some of which support the Panel's interpretation that "employment" means only "modified employment." Compare Black Roofing Inc. v. West, 967 P.2d 195, 196 (Colo.App.1998)(claimant injured while engaged in regular employment, but terminated for drinking and unexcused absences after retu......
  • LIBERTY HTS. v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS, 00CA2213.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • July 19, 2001
    ...or may not involve fault. See Bestway Concrete v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 984 P.2d 680 (Colo.App.1999); Black Roofing Inc. v. West, 967 P.2d 195 (Colo.App. 1998). Moreover, the decision in Laurel Manor Care recognized that, if the PDM Molding analysis were applied to § 8-42-105(3)(......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT