Black v. Black, 35620
| Decision Date | 20 February 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 35620,35620 |
| Citation | 245 Ga. 281,264 S.E.2d 216 |
| Parties | BLACK v. BLACK. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Watson, Brown, Foster & Murphy, John L. Watson, Jr., Jonesboro, for appellant.
Steinberg & Osborne, Leonard N. Steinberg, Forest Park, for appellee.
Appellee is the holder of a judgment for alimony contained in a divorce decree. The decree resulted from a complaint previously filed by appellee in which there was no prayer for the issuance of a process. Nevertheless, process was issued and service was had. Appellant answered the complaint and contested the lawsuit but did so without raising any objection to the absence of a prayer for the issuance of process.
Appellee subsequently filed a garnishment proceeding and appellant moved to vacate and set aside the final decree of divorce which contained the judgment for alimony and attempted to enjoin appellee from seeking a summons of garnishment without having first obtained a writ of fieri facias.
The trial court denied the motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and did not enjoin the appellee in her efforts to secure a summons of garnishment. From the ruling of the trial court, the appellant takes his appeal. Although appellant enumerates nine errors, only two issues are raised which must be addressed by this court. First, there is the issue of whether the failure to pray for process renders a subsequent judgment void in spite of the fact that process did issue, answer was made and no objection was made to the absence of the prayer. The second issue is whether a judgment holder must secure a fi. fa. before proceeding to seek a summons of garnishment.
1. It is well established that divorce and alimony cases proceed under the Civil Practice Act. Price v. Price, 243 Ga. 4, 252 S.E.2d 402 (1979); Ivey v. Ivey, 233 Ga. 45, 209 S.E.2d 590 (1974). The Civil Practice Act as adopted in Georgia contains no requirement that a prayer for process be included in the complaint in order for valid service of process to be effected. Matthews v. Fayette County, 233 Ga. 220, 210 S.E.2d 758 (1974). Furthermore, a defense of insufficiency of process or insufficiency of service of process is waived unless such defenses are made by motion or included in responsive pleadings as originally filed. Code Ann. § 81A-112. The record in this case reveals no such motion nor does it reveal the issue being raised in the responsive pleadings. The appellant made a general appearance before the court having jurisdiction over him, thereby submitting himself to jurisdiction of the court and waiving any claim of insufficiency of process or insufficiency of services of process. Shephard v. Shephard, 239 Ga. 22, 235 S.E.2d 538 (1977). Therefore, we find that the trial court acted properly in denying the motion to vacate and set aside the final decree and judgment for divorce and alimony.
2. Appellant's contention that the issuance of a fi. fa. is a prerequisite to the issuance of a summons of garnishment is also without merit. A garnishment proceeds from a money judgment. Code Ann. § 46-101. It has been decided in Division 1 above that a valid underlying judgment exists. We find nothing in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Strickland v. Alexander
...Morgan v. Morgan, 156 Ga.App. 726, 275 S.E.2d 673 (1980) ); State's Br. [Doc. 98] at 8 (citing Antico, Easterwood, and Black v. Black, 245 Ga. 281, 264 S.E.2d 216 (1980) ). None of these cases, however, raised the issues of notice and timeliness regarding exemptions and claim procedures tha......
- Hardy v. State
-
Francis v. Scorpion Grp., LLC (In re Francis)
...on each pending Motion. 1. An execution and a writ of fieri facias or ( fi fa ) are used synonymously in Georgia. Black v. Black, 245 Ga. 281, 264 S.E.2d 216 (1980). 2. Alternatively, state law authorizes ad valorem tax foreclosures, if authorized by local ordinance. O.C.G.A. § 48–4–75 et s......
-
Z-Space, Inc. v. Dantanna's CNN Ctr., LLC.
...to enforce a judgment for the payment of money shall be a writ of execution unless the court directs otherwise."); Black v. Black , 245 Ga. 281, 282 (2), 264 S.E.2d 216 (1980) ("A garnishment proceeds from a money judgment."). The plaintiff alleged no facts in the complaint indicating the e......