Black v. Bland Farms, LLC.
Decision Date | 30 June 2015 |
Docket Number | A15A1610.,Nos. A15A0042,s. A15A0042 |
Citation | 774 S.E.2d 722,332 Ga.App. 653 |
Parties | BLACK v. BLAND FARMS, LLC. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Isaac Byrd, Deputy Atty. Gen., John Edward Hennelly, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Ahern Monyak, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Appellant.
Balch & Bingham, Christopher Scott Anulewicz, Michael J. Bowers, Joshua Michael Moore, Atlanta, for Appellee.
Alston & Bird, Nowell D. Berreth, Davis J. Stewart, Kyle G.A. Wallace, amici curiae.
In Case No. A15A0042, Gary Black, in his official capacity as the Georgia Commissioner of Agriculture (“the Commissioner”), appeals from a trial court ruling declaring a new Vidalia onion packing regulation invalid. The Commissioner contends that the plaintiff, Bland Farms, LLC, did not demonstrate that it had standing to bring the action, and that the new regulation was a valid one. For the following reasons, we agree with the trial court that Bland Farms has standing to bring a declaratory judgment action, but hold that the packing regulation was a valid exercise of the Commissioner's authority pursuant to the Vidalia Onion Act, OCGA § 2–14–130 et seq. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part in Case No. A15A0042. Case No. A15A1610 is dismissed as moot.1
In 1986, the Georgia General Assembly enacted the Vidalia Onion Act, OCGA § 2–14–130. Use of the term “Vidalia” is prescribed by OCGA § 2–14–132 :
Only onions which are of the Vidalia onion variety and which are grown within the Vidalia onion production area may be identified, classified, packaged, labeled, or otherwise designated for sale inside or outside this state as Vidalia onions. The term “Vidalia” may be used in connection with the labeling, packaging, classifying, or identifying of onions for sale inside or outside this state only if the onions are of the Vidalia onion variety and are grown in the Vidalia onion production area.
The Commissioner averred: “In 1990, the State of Georgia, through the Department of Agriculture, applied for the U.S. certification mark ‘Vidalia®,’ and the mark was registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on August 19, 1992.” In 2000, the legislature amended the Vidalia Onion Act to provide that “[t]he Commissioner of Agriculture is authorized to take all actions necessary and appropriate” to promote and protect that trademark “for use on or in connection with the sale or promotion of Vidalia onions and products containing Vidalia onions.” OCGA § 2–14–132.1.
Within the past few years, however, the Georgia Department of Agriculture (“the Department”) “received a large number of complaints from consumers unhappy with the quality of Vidalia® onions on the store's shelves ... Decreased consumer confidence could ultimately lead to reduced demand for Vidalia® onions and the potential for long-term adverse economic impacts on Geogia's Vidalia® onion industry.” The Commissioner stated further:
The Vidalia® onion industry has faced a serious quality control problem caused in large part because Vidalia® onions are being harvested prematurely. Vidalia® onions are typically planted in the fall season and are rarely ready to be harvested before mid-April. The Vidalia® onion needs time in the soil to fully mature and develop the sweet flavor and other characteristics for which it is known. Some Vidalia® growers, in an attempt to beat their competitors to fill store shelves with sweet onions, have shipped onions under the Vidalia® trademark that were harvested too soon and of poor quality, with diminished shelf life. This practice has diminished consumer confidence in Vidalia® onions.
In order to address these concerns, on June 27, 2013, the Department sent a “Notice of Intent to Consider Amendments to certain rules pertaining to the Georgia Vidalia Onion Act” to all interested persons and parties. The notice invited written comments that would be considered at a public hearing to be held on July 30, 2013. The Commissioner proposed to promulgate a regulation that would establish a “packing date” before which no onion could be packed as a Vidalia onion:
Packing precedes shipping, and by setting an appropriate April deadline before which no Vidalia® onion could be packed, much less shipped, the packing date would have the salutary effect of requiring growers to keep the onions in the soil for a longer period of time and provide more time for curing the onions.
Prior to the July 2013 hearing, the Commissioner received letters in support of the proposed regulation. One grower explained:
A second grower explained in a letter to the Commissioner that “[t]he poor quality of these early onions was one significant contributing factor to the poor demand for Vidalia onions this year.” Another grower noted in his letter that a pack date may not be “the answer, but it is likely the best answer to our industry concerns.” (Emphasis in original.) He explained:
We've taken a May/June fresh market and forced it into an April/May market—akin to forcing a square peg into a round hole. By bowing to the demand of buyers who “won't get beat” regarding first to market, we've done ourselves and the consumer a disservice by placing an inferior product on the market in those first weeks of shipping ... we saw untold receivers leave Vidalia® before we got started good, to return to Texas.
Representatives from several onion farms attended the July 2013 meeting, including representatives from Bland Farms. Counsel for Bland Farms expressed strong opposition to the proposed rule change on grounds that such a change “can only be done by the legislature” and would alter the current shipping date set forth in OCGA § 2–14–136. Several other onion growers testified that they were in favor of the proposed regulation because they felt it was needed to protect the Vidalia brand. One grower explained that immature onions are “jeopardizing our industry.” Another grower testified:
Our industry has suffered the last few years ... as a result of onions being put on the market early that were immature, that were dug premature ... And I think we have much better varieties. Our industry was founded on the traditional Vidalia varieties, not the early varieties—the shape, the taste, the shelf life ... Inspection service is great and I think there's something to be said for our inspection service. But going about it of fixing our problem with only a more strict inspection service I don't think is going to work. Number one, the manpower. To inspect every load that gets shipped out of the industry, we don't have the manpower for that ... Keep in mind that a lot of our onions that were shipped this year, that were shipped prior to the 15th, which is our set opening date, were inspected; they passed an inspection. And you can make these onions pass inspection, but once they get on the shelf, they don't have any shelf life.
A third grower testified:
I've been growing onions 50–plus years, and there's been more damage done to the Vidalia name recognition of the onion in the last few years by planting all these early-variety onions that are not what fall in the category of what I consider a true Vidalia onion. We built this name of the Vidalia onion on a good, true onion that is sweet, has good shelf life, and what's been hitting the market early in the past few years has not been the true Vidalia onions ... Breeders are breeding onions that come off 30 days early. They might come off 30 days earlier but they're not the true Vidalia nature of the onion. They're not sweet, they're not mild, you have aftertaste, and they do not last ... We're rushing the onions; we're...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lathrop v. Deal
...application interferes with or impairs the legal rights of the petitioner." OCGA § 50–13–10 (a). See also Black v. Bland Farms, LLC , 332 Ga.App. 653, 659, 774 S.E.2d 722 (2015). The Administrative Procedure Act likewise explicitly authorizes judicial review of final agency decisions in con......
-
Administrative Law
...837 (1984).32. Tibbies, 297 Ga. At 564-65, 775 S.E.2d at 533-34.33. Id. at 563, 775 S.E.2d at 532.34. Id. at 566, 775 S.E.2d at 534.35. 332 Ga. App. 653, 774 S.E.2d 722 (2015).36. Id. at 664, 774 S.E.2d at 730.37. Id. at 663, 774 S.E.2d at 729; O.C.G.A. § 2-14-136 (2000 & Supp. 2016).38. 33......