Black v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 31 March 1909 |
Citation | 117 S.W. 1142,217 Mo. 672 |
Parties | BLACK v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; James H. Slover, Judge.
Action by William H. Black against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
The plaintiff brought this suit against the defendant in the circuit court of Jackson county to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by him through the negligence of defendant by a shock caused by an electric current passing through his body while a passenger upon one of defendant's cars. A trial was had and a judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $8,500. After taking the proper preliminary steps, the defendant duly appealed the cause to this court.
In substance, the petition alleges that on the car in question there was a sand box below the platform of the car, upon which there was a metallic cover, which was set in the floor of the platform so as to become a part thereof. The petition alleges that defendant negligently permitted the electrical apparatus and equipment of the car to become and remain defective, and, in another paragraph, negligently managed and operated the electrical apparatus and equipment "in such manner that the aforesaid metallic cover to said sand receptacle and other metallic parts of the rear end of said car became charged with electricity, and thereby became dangerous and unsafe and liable to injure passengers standing upon or passing over same." Plaintiff alleged his inability to more accurately describe the negligent condition and operation of the car. He then sets out the manner of receiving his alleged injury: "That on the date hereinbefore mentioned while plaintiff was a lawful passenger upon said car, and while said car was at or near the intersection of Nineteenth street with Main street, he attempted to walk from the rear vestibule of said car into the body or inclosed part of said car, and in doing so he stepped one foot upon said metallic cover of said sand receptacle and the other upon the metallic part of the sill of the door connecting the said vestibule with the inclosed part of said car; that immediately he received a powerful electric shock, the electric current passing through his body and injuring him as follows," etc. The answer was a general denial.
The plaintiff was the only witness who described the manner in which he claims to have received the shock; and his testimony in that regard is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bush v. Kansas City Pub. Serv. Co.
...S.W. (2d) 851; Gandy v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. Co., 44 S.W. (2d) 634; Kitchen v. Schlueter Mfg. Co., 20 S.W. (2d) 676; Black v. Met. Street Ry. Co., 217 Mo. 672, 117 S.W. 1142; Barber v. Kellogg, 123 S.W. (2d) 100; State ex rel. Shell Petroleum Co. v. Hostetter, 156 S.W. (2d) 673; State ex rel.......
-
Meeker v. Union Electric Light & Power Company
... ... Railroad, 224 Mo. 564; State ex rel. v ... Ellison, 270 Mo. 645; Bank v. Murdock, 62 Mo ... 70; Mansur v. Botts, 80 Mo. 651; Black v ... Railroad, 217 Mo. 672; Tinkle v. Railway Co., ... 212 Mo. 445; Eads v. Galt Tel. Co., 199 S.W. 710; ... McGrath v. Transit Co., 197 ... ...
-
Kitchen v. Schlueter Mfg. Co.
... ... Head, 248 Mo. 262; Hudson v ... Cahoun, 193 Mo. 557; E. St. L. Ice & Cold Storage ... Co. v. Kuhlmann, 238 Mo. 702; Metropolitan Paving ... Co. v. Investment Co., 309 Mo. 661; Cole v ... Parker-Washington Co., 276 Mo. 266. (2) The court erred ... in overruling ... hypothesis or state of facts neither alleged specifically in ... the petition, nor within the general scope of the petition ... In Black v. Metropolitan Street Railway, 217 Mo ... 672, Graves, J., in a separate concurring opinion at page ... 685, said: ... "I ... ...
-
Willis v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
... ... 1119; Mitchell v. Brown, 190 S.W. 354; ... Gayle v. Mo. C. & F. Co., 76 S.W. 987; Kitchen ... v. Schlueter Mfg. Co., 20 S.W.2d 676; Black v ... Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 117 S.W. 1142. (3) There was ... no prejudicial error in peramitting Mr. Brazil to explain ... what was told him ... ...