Black v. Williams, 53296
| Citation | 417 So.2d 911 |
| Decision Date | 21 July 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 53296,53296 |
| Parties | J. T. BLACK v. Katharine S. WILLIAMS. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi |
Arnold F. Gwin, Lott, Sanders, Gwin & Fonda, Greenwood, for appellant.
William E. Suddath, Jr., Watkins & Eager, Jackson, for appellee.
Before SUGG, P. J., and BROOM and HAWKINS, JJ.
J. T. Black appeals from a final decree of the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Carroll County enjoining him from using that portion of a drainage district lake over realty belonging to Mrs. Katharine S. Williams. We affirm.
In 1965, pursuant to an easement authorizing it to do so, the Big Sand Drainage District erected a flood retarding dam, which subsequently formed a lake of 125.3 acres. Mrs. Elizabeth G. Saunders, the mother and predecessor in title of Mrs. Williams, owned 110.9 acres of the land beneath the lake. Mr. Black acquired title to property adjoining Mrs. Williams, 14.4 acres of which formed a portion of the lake bed in the Northwest part. There was nothing in the easement granted the drainage district by the landowners which altered or restricted any of their rights of ownership except in controlling the flow of water.
Over the objections of Mrs. Williams, Mr. Black claimed the right to use that portion of the lake over the land of Mrs. Williams. The boundary between the two areas had been marked by posts.
In a suit to remove the cloud thus constituted on her title and enjoin Mr. Black from using the portion of the lake over her land, the chancery court cancelled all claim of Mr. Black thereto and permanently enjoined him from entering on the part of the lake over the land of Mrs. Williams.
We are not confronted in this case with the rights of users of public waterways, as defined by Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 51-1-4 (Supp.1981), or referred to in Downes v. Crosby Chemicals, Inc., 234 So.2d 916 (Miss.1970), a case decided by this Court before the enactment of this statute.
Also, an examination of State Game and Fish Commission v. Louis Fritz Co., 187 Miss. 539, 193 So. 9 (1940), reveals it has minimal application to the question presented here. That case involved the right of the State, acting under a statute, to remove undesirable fish and turtles from South Horn Lake, a natural lake connected to the Mississippi River by a pass or outlet, which outlet was twenty to forty feet wide, four to ten feet deep, navigable in all seasons by rowboats, and through which fish migrated.
The sole...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dycus v. Sillers
...or "artificial", the record title holders own the waters and all life within them as their interests may appear, Black v. Williams, 417 So.2d 911, 912 (Miss.1982), whether the lake or pond has been built for commercial, drainage, recreational or aesthetic reasons. By the same token, our law......
-
State v. Meyers
...at 1022, 14 N.W.2d at 716 ; Peck v. Alfred Olsen Constr. Co. , 216 Iowa 519, 522–27, 245 N.W. 131, 134–37 (1932) ; Black v. Williams , 417 So. 2d 911, 911–12 (Miss. 1982) ; Smoulter v. Boyd , 209 Pa. 146, 58 A. 144, 146–47 (1904) ; Mountain Props. , 767 A.2d at 1099–1101 ; White’s Mill Colo......
-
Wehby v. Turpin
...v. Thomas, 114 So.2d 791 (Fla.1959), discussed infra, in which the Florida Supreme Court had adopted the civil law rule); Black v. Williams, 417 So.2d 911 (Miss.1982) (addressing only the rights of owners of land beneath "artificial" or "man-made" lakes); Crenshaw v. Graybeal, 597 So.2d 650......
-
Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. Buccino
...lake beyond the boundaries of their own land."16 (Citation omitted.) Wehby v. Turpin, supra, 710 So. 2d 1249; see also Black v. Williams, 417 So. 2d 911, 912 (Miss. 1982) (holding that owners of subaqueous lands only have right to use portions of lake above their Similarly, in Anderson v. B......