Blackman v. Garrett

Decision Date11 October 1910
Citation69 S.E. 110,135 Ga. 226
PartiesBLACKMAN et al. v. GARRETT et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

Where a bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of an interlocutory injunction, and it appears therefrom that certain documentary and vital evidence was introduced upon the hearing, and such evidence is neither incorporated in the bill nor referred to therein and attached thereto as an exhibit properly authenticated, and no brief of the evidence has been approved and filed, so as to become a part of the record, but such documentary evidence is merely specified by the excepting party as a part of the record to be sent up to this court by the clerk of the trial court, the judgment will be affirmed, as without such evidence this court cannot determine the question whether the judge erred in refusing the injunction, and the same, not being as part of the record in the case, cannot be specified and sent up to this court as such. Askew v. Hogansville Cotton Oil Co., 126 Ga. 807, 55 S.E. 921; Edmondson v. Edmondson, 128 Ga. 53, 57 S.E. 308; Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 66. S.E. 938, and cases cited.

Error from Superior Court, Haralson County; Price Edwards, Judge.

Action between S.D. Blackman and others and E. T. Garrett and others. From the judgment, Blackman and others bring error. Affirmed.

M. J. Head, for plaintiffs in error.

Griffith & Mathews, for defendants in error.

FISH, C.J.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 18 Noviembre 1970
    ...there was a denial of counsel. But we cannot consider this as evidence. Robinson v. Woodward, 134 Ga. 777, 68 S.E. 553; Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226, 69 S.E. 110; Silvey & Co. v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104, 72 S.E. 907; Secured Ins. Co. v. Whitley Construction Co., 111 Ga.App. 430, 142 S.E.2d 8......
  • Greenfield v. Harvey
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 15 Octubre 1940
    ... ... 576, ... 94 S.E. 1021; Leggett v. Pridgen, 150 Ga. 115, 102 ... S.E. 829. See, also, Glover v. State, 128 Ga. 1, 57 ... S.E. 101; Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226, 69 S.E ... 110; Silvey [& Co.] v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104, 72 S.E. 907; ... Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 160 Ga. 792, 129 ... ...
  • Greenfield v. Harvey
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 15 Octubre 1940
    ...Ga. 576, 94 S.E. 1021; Leggett v. Pridgcn, 150 Ga. 115, 102 S.E. 829. See, also, Glover v. State, 128 Ga. 1, 57 S.E. 101; Blackmail v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226, 69 S.E. 110; Silvey [& Co.] v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104, 72 S. E. 907; Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 160 Ga. 792, 129 S.E. 108. In the tran......
  • Voyles v. Fed. Land Bank Of D.C.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 16 Diciembre 1931
    ...Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 160 Ga. 792, 129 S. E. 108, and cit.; Copeland v. Copeland, 166 Ga. 277, 142 S. E. 870. In Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226, 69 S. E. 110, Chief Justice Fish, speaking for the court, said: "Where a bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of an interlocutor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT