Blackmon v. Feinstein
| Decision Date | 19 April 1972 |
| Parties | Application of Monty BLACKMON, Respondent, v. Samuel FEINSTEIN, Director of West Seneca State School, New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Albany, Joseph J. Ricotta, Dunkirk, for appellant.
Martoche & Collesano, Salvatore R. Martoche, Buffalo, for respondent.
Joseph T. Weingold, New York City, amicus curiae.
Before MARSH, J.P., and WITMER, MOULE, CARDAMONE, and HENRY, JJ.
Petitioner was first employed by respondent director of West Seneca State School on August 19, 1967 and was assigned to work in Ward Six, a special, low I.Q. group of patients with serious physical and mental handicaps, needing elemental assistance. On June 12, 1970 he was suspended on charges of mistreatment of patients, and after a hearing thereon the hearing officer found him guilty of such mistreatment in that he dropped and struck patients and caused one to smoke a cigarette, something particularly harmful to the patient. Petitioner's guilt of such misconduct is not challenged in this proceeding. In his report the hearing officer recommended that a fine of $50 be imposed upon petitioner. Respondent director reviewed the report and concluded that, ; and he dismissed petitioner. Special Term determined that this constituted unreasonable and excessive punishment. Upon this record we find that respondent's action was supported in fact and was neither arbitrary nor capricious. By no means does it shock the conscience of the court, but, instead, it appears to be a reasonable determination in the best interests of the administration of the School. Special Term erred in annulling that determination and imposing only the fine recommended by the hearing officer.
Judgment unanimously reversed, determination confirmed and petition dismissed, all without costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Romano v. Canuteson
...49 A.D.2d 6, 10, 371 N.Y.S.2d 213 (1975), aff'd, 40 N.Y.2d 921, 389 N.Y.S.2d 576, 358 N.E.2d 268 (1976); see also Blackmon v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137 (1972) (mem.); Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957, 965 (2d Cir.1982) (citing McIntyre v. New York City Dep't of Correction, 41......
-
Brown v. Ristich
...of Traber v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 643, 331 N.Y.S.2d 150, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 860, 346 N.Y.S.2d 529, 229 N.E.2d 895; Matter of Blackmon v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137.) ...
-
Merchant v. New York State Dept. of Mental Hygiene
...in her care. The determination appears to be in the best interests of the administration of the school (Matter of Blackmon v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137; Matter of Nicolay v. Port of New York Authority, 32 A.D.2d 619, 299 N.Y.S.2d Judgment reversed, determination confirmed a......
-
Reid v. Greenberg
...Albany, William J. Goldman, Rochester, for respondent. Determination unanimously confirmed without costs. (See Matter of Blackmon v. Feinstein, 39 A.D.2d 642, 331 N.Y.S.2d 137.) (Review of Determination dismissing petitioner, transferred by Order of Oneida Special Term, Roy, Present: GOLDMA......