Blackwell v. Franchi, SC: 155413

Decision Date27 October 2017
Docket NumberCOA: 328929,SC: 155413
Citation902 N.W.2d 595 (Mem)
Parties Susan BLACKWELL, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Dean FRANCHI and Debra Franchi, Defendants–Appellants.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered.

We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellants shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the appellants owed a duty to warn the appellee of the condition on the land at issue, given the general rule that "[a] landowner owes a licensee a duty only to warn the licensee of any hidden dangers the owner knows or has reason to know of, if the licensee does not know or have reason to know of the dangers involved," Stitt v . Holland Abundant Life Fellowship , 462 Mich. 591, 596, 614 N.W.2d 88 (2000). In addition to the brief, the appellants shall electronically file an appendix containing the items listed at MCR 7.312(D)(2). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellants' brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellants. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellants within 14 days of being served with the appellee's brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Blackwell v. Franchi
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 25 d3 Julho d3 2018
    ...of the dangers involved," Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship , 462 Mich. 591, 596, 614 N.W.2d 88 (2000). [ Blackwell v. Franchi , 501 Mich. 903, 902 N.W.2d 595 (2017) (second alteration in original).]II. STANDARD OF REVIEWThis Court reviews de novo the grant or denial of summary disp......
  • Blackwell v. Franchi
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 20 d5 Março d5 2020
    ...to address "whether the appellants owed a duty to warn the appellee of the condition on the land at issue ...." Blackwell v. Franchi , 501 Mich. 903, 902 N.W.2d 595 (2017). Ultimately, however, a majority of the Court declined to resolve this issue, deciding instead to remand to the Court o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT