Blackwood v. Davidson

Decision Date16 October 1939
Docket Number4-5571
Citation132 S.W.2d 799,198 Ark. 1055
PartiesBLACKWOOD v. DAVIDSON
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from Mississippi Chancery Court, Chickasawba District; J. F Gautney, Chancellor; reversed.

Decree reversed and cause remanded.

Jesse Taylor and W. Leon Smith, for appellant.

Frank C. Douglas, for appellee.

OPINION

MEHAFFY, J.

In 1930, W. S. Davidson was the owner of 160 acres of land in Mississippi county, Arkansas. J. R. Crowe was the owner of 320 acres of land in Arkansas county, Arkansas, subject to an indebtedness of $ 7,000. Davidson and Crowe entered into a contract to exchange lands. Davidson agreed to assume the indebtedness due on the Crowe lands, and Crowe to remain in possession of said lands for three years, but to execute a note for the rental thereof for the third year in the sum of $ 3,600. The contract was not recorded and no reference was made to it in the deeds between Crowe and Davidson.

On June 19, 1930, Davidson executed and delivered to Crowe his warranty deed conveying the lands in Mississippi county to Crowe, the consideration mentioned in the deed being the sum of $ 1 paid and exchange of land between Davidson and Crowe. This deed was recorded at the recorder's office in Blytheville on June 23, 1930.

On May 8, 1931, J. R. Crowe, being indebted to Dwight H. Blackwood in the sum of $ 4,000, evidenced by his promissory note, executed and delivered to Blackwood a deed of trust in the execution of which his wife joined, conveying to Blackwood the real property located in Mississippi county which he had acquired by warranty deed from Davidson.

Blackwood had no knowledge, either actual or constructive, at the time he loaned the money to Crowe and took the deed of trust from him, of any claim which Davidson might have against said land by the unrecorded contract.

Crowe failed to execute the rental note and on October 15, 1932 Davidson filed suit in the chancery court of Chickasawba district of Mississippi county, Arkansas, against Crowe in which he sought to have a vendor's lien declared on the Mississippi county property to enforce the payment of the $ 3,600 due Crowe and filed lis pendens notice. Blackwood had no knowledge of the claim of Davidson, and was not made a party to the suit by Davidson to enforce the lien.

Blackwood's mortgage was filed for record January 3, 1933. Davidson knew of the mortgage before it was filed and knew of it when he began suit against Crowe. After Blackwood's mortgage was filed and recorded, Davidson was given a decree against Crowe and a lien declared on the land. Davidson purchased the land at the commissioner's sale.

Payments had been made to Blackwood by Crowe from time to time, and on August 5, 1938, Blackwood brought this suit against Crowe and Davidson to secure judgment for the balance due him and to enforce his mortgage lien. He filed and there was recorded, a lis pendens notice.

In April, 1938, Davidson entered into a contract with one H. H Hardesty to sell the lands in Mississippi county, and received payment of $ 500.

After Blackwood had filed suit, Davidson filed answer setting up the suit which he had brought against Crowe, the decree, sale, and purchase of said land under said decree, and further pleaded the statute of limitations. The chancellor rendered a decree against Crowe in favor of Blackwood for the amount due, principal and interest, and dismissed the complaint as to Davidson. The case was tried on the following evidence, which was agreed to by the parties as evidence:

"1. That the land involved in this cause of action is the northeast quarter (NE 1/4) of section thirty-four (34), township sixteen (16) north, range twelve (12) east of Mississippi county, Arkansas.

"2. That in 1930 this land was owned by the defendant, W. S. Davidson, and in May, 1930, Davidson entered into a contract with J. R. Crowe to exchange this land to said Crowe for some other lands in Prairie county, Arkansas, and as a part of the consideration for the exchange and transfer, Crowe agreed to pay Davidson, $ 3,600, which was to be represented by a note to be executed by said Crowe, and said amount was also to cover the rental on the Prairie county land for one year. Crowe failed to execute his note or make his payment as per his contract. On June 19, 1930, Davidson (without his wife's joining) conveyed the above described lands to Crowe for a recited consideration of '$ 1 to me paid and the exchange of lands between myself and J. R. Crowe,' said deed now being of record in the recorder's office in Blytheville, Arkansas, where the same now appears of record in Deed Record 59, page 399, having been filed for record on the 23rd day of June, 1930.

"3. On May 8, 1931, the defendant, J. R. Crowe, was indebted to the plaintiff, Dwight H. Blackwood, in the sum of four thousand dollars ($ 4,000) as evidenced by a promissory note of said date due six months after date and bearing interest from maturity at the rate of ten per cent. per annum until paid; that to secure said indebtedness the defendant, J. R. Crowe and his wife, Hazel Crowe, executed on the 8th day of May, 1931, a mortgage conveying the above described property to the said Dwight H. Blackwood which said mortgage was filed for record on the 3rd day of February, 1933, where the same now appears of record in trust deed record W-1 at page 310 in the recorder's office in Blytheville, Arkansas.

"4. That Crowe failed to execute the note for three thousand six hundred dollars ($ 3,600) to Davidson and failed to pay the said amount, and that on October 15, 1932, Davidson filed suit in the chancery court for the Chickasawba district of Mississippi county, Arkansas, in which he sought to obtain judgment against Crowe in said sum and to have a vendor's lien declared on the property, and at the same time filed lis pendens notice which appears in Lis Pendens Record No. 2, at page 138, in the recorder's office in Blytheville, Arkansas. At the time this suit was filed, Blackwood had not filed his deed of trust from J. R. Crowe and his wife, Hazel Crowe, but did file the same on the 3rd day of February, 1933.

"5. At the time of the execution of the deed from Davidson to Crowe, the above described property was unencumbered, and at the time of the execution and delivery of the deed of trust from Crowe and wife to Blackwood said property was unencumbered except whatever right Davidson may have had to enforce his claim against Crowe for the three thousand six hundred dollars ($ 3,600).

"6. On the note given by J. R. Crowe to the plaintiff, Dwight H. Blackwood, the following payments have been made:

September 8, 1935

$ 200.00

January 8, 1936

650.00

February 8, 1936

250.00

March 8, 1936

350.00

July 8, 1938

500.00

None of these payments have been noted upon the margin of the record of the deed of trust securing this indebtedness as said deed of trust appears in Trust Deed Record W-1, at page 310.

"7. That on the 5th day of August, 1938, the plaintiff, Dwight H Blackwood, filed this suit to foreclose his mortgage, and at the same time filed lis pendens notice which appears in Lis Pendens Record 2, at page 375, in the recorder's office in Blytheville, Arkansas.

"8. That Crowe contested the suit filed by Davidson, and a receiver was appointed to take charge of and rent land; that decree was rendered in favor of Davidson in said suit on September 25, 1933, and on appeal to the Supreme Court, by Crowe, the case was affirmed and the opinion of the court now appears in 189 Ark. 414, 72 S.W.2d 763. Thereafter the land was duly advertised by the commissioner appointed by the court, and at the sale, conducted by the commissioner, on the 26th day of February, 1934, Davidson became the purchaser at said sale for a consideration of three thousand seven hundred fifty dollars ($ 3,750) which sale was by this court confirmed and the commissioner's deed executed and approved by the court.

"9. That on the same day that Davidson conveyed the above described property to Crowe, Crowe executed and delivered to Davidson a warranty deed conveying the property in Prairie county, Arkansas, to Davidson according to the terms of the contract.

"10. That the contract to exchange lands between Davidson and Crowe was not filed for record, and that, Blackwood had no knowledge, actual or constructive, of the existence of said contract at the time of the execution and delivery to him of the trust deed by Crowe and his wife conveying said property; that at about the time Blackwood filed his mortgage for record in the Chickasawba district of Mississippi county, Arkansas, he knew of the suit pending by Davidson against Crowe, but he did not make himself a party thereto, and that, at said time the note from Crowe to Blackwood was past due and no payments had been made thereon; that at the same time Davidson had actual knowledge of the existence of the indebtedness from Crowe to Blackwood and of the mortgage given by Crowe to Blackwood to secure the same, but that Blackwood was never made a party to the suit by Davidson against Crowe. That Blackwood and counsel for Davidson discussed the sale of said land, and that Blackwood knew of the sale of the land under the Davidson decree against Crowe, and that Blackwood also knew that Davidson's wife had not relinquished dower and homestead in the deed from Davidson to Crowe; that Blackwood further knew that Davidson took possession of the land after he purchased at the commissioner's sale, and that Davidson is now in possession of said land.

"11. That either party herein may submit any record or documentary evidence in reference to this case, and that copies of the same may be filed and treated in evidence the same as though the original records thereof are introduced.

"12. That on ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Blackwood v. Davidson
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1939
  • Hill v. Hopkins
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1939
  • Wickwire-Mitchell Royalty Trust v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • February 6, 1947
    ...case where he has knowledge which would have put him on inquiry, such as would have led to a knowledge of the facts." Blackwood v. Davidson, 198 Ark. 1055, 132 S.W.2d 799. Even granting that McDaniel had the right to and did rescind the sale theretofore made by him to Barnett and repossess ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT