Blair v. State
Decision Date | 31 March 1892 |
Citation | 90 Ga. 326,17 S.E. 96 |
Parties | BLAIR. v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Constitutional Law—Title of Act—City Charter—Extending Territory op Police Department.
The act entitled "An act to create a new charter for the city of Columbus, and to consolidate and declare the rights and powers of said corporation, and for other purposes, " approved November 29, 1890, is unconstitutional in so far as it provides for extending and exercising municipal police jurisdiction over and upon territory adjacent to the city. This being so, a policeman had no more power than any private person to make arrests on such adjacent territory, and no power whatever to arrest for the use of abusive language tending to cause a breach of the peace, addressed at the moment to the policeman himself. The title of the act affords no indication of any extension of power, whatever, beyond the corporate limits.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from superior court, Muscogee county; J. H. Martin, Judge.
Julius Blair was convicted of assault, and brings error. Reversed.
Cameron & McLester and M. H. Bland-ford, for plaintiff in error.
A. A. Carson, Sol. Gen., J. H. Worrill, and Morgan Mc-Michael, for the State.
The constitution declares that "no law or ordinance shall pass which refers to more than one subject-matter, or contains matter different from what Is expressed in the title thereof." Code, § 5067. The question Is whether the latter part of this inhibitory provision has not been violated by the legislature in enacting the third section in the charter of the city of Columbus, approved November 29, 1890. The title of the act constituting the charter reads thus: "An act to create a new charter for the city of Columbus, and to consolidate and declare the rights and powers of said corporation, and for other purposes." The third section is in these words: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Warde
... ... state on account of sex ... (a) ... Prior to the act of the Legislature of Georgia (Acts 1921, p ... 38,§ 2, par. 1) women were not ... because the body of the act contains matter different from ... that contained in the caption thereof. The first case cited ... is that of Blair v. State, 90 Ga. 326, 329, 330, 17 ... S.E. 96, 97 (35 Am.St.Rep. 206). The last sentence of the ... quotation from that case is as follows: "The ... ...
-
Nelson v. Southern Guaranty Ins. Co.
...The purpose of this constitutional provision is 'to protect the people against covert or surprise legislation.' Blair v. State, 90 Ga. 326, 329, 17 S.E. 96, 97, 35 Am.St.Rep. 206; Central of Ga. R. Co. v. State of Georgia, 104 Ga. 831, 845(4), 31 S.E. 531, 42 LRA 518. The caption of the 196......
-
Brown v. Clower
...caption of all Acts of the General Assembly is "to protect the people against covert or surprise legislation.' Blair v. State, 90 Ga. 326, 329, 17 S.E. 96, 35 Am.St.Rep. 206; Central of Ga. R. Co. v. State of Ga., 104 Ga. 831, 845, 31 S.E. 531, 42 L.R.A. 518.' Nelson v. Southern Guaranty In......
-
Lamar v. Pearre
... ... ... Syllabus by the Court ... 1 ... Under the system of pleading prevailing in this state, the ... positive and unqualified charges of material facts contained ... in a bill in equity praying for relief and waiving discovery, ... though ... ...