Blair v. State, WD
| Citation | 683 S.W.2d 269 |
| Decision Date | 31 July 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. WD,WD |
| Parties | Walter Junior BLAIR, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. 35053. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Judge.
James W. Fletcher, Public Defender and Gary L. Gardner, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for movant-appellant.
John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., and John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before TURNAGE, C.J., and SOMERVILLE and MANFORD, JJ.
ORDER
This is a direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 27.26.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Blair v. Armontrout
...denied Blair relief, and the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District of Missouri affirmed that judgment. Blair v. State, 683 S.W.2d 269 (Mo.Ct.App.1984). Blair then petitioned for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied relief, Blair v. Armontrout, ......
-
Blair v. Armontrout
...was subsequently denied and that denial was affirmed by the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District. Blair v. State, 683 S.W.2d 269 (Mo.Ct.App.1984) (per curiam). Blair then brought this habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. He argued that the prosecution: (1) calle......
-
Blair v. Armontrout, 85-0155-CV-W-5.
...counsel Morris on the appeal. On July 31, 1984, the denial of Blair's Rule 27.26 motion was affirmed. Blair v. State, 683 S.W.2d 269 (Mo.App.W.D.1984) (unpublished memorandum opinion). Following that affirmance, Gardner filed a motion on Blair's behalf with the Western District Court of App......