Blakely v. State

Decision Date22 October 1948
Docket Number32083.
Citation50 S.E.2d 762,78 Ga.App. 282
PartiesBLAKELY v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1948.

Syllabus by the Court.

1. The court charged: 'The testimony of a single witness is generally sufficient to establish a fact. An exception to this rule is made in the case of a felony--and burglary is a felony--where the only witness is an accomplice; in such case corroborating circumstances may dispense with another witness. The corroborating circumstances referred to must be such as to connect the defendant with the perpetration of the crime, and tend to show his participation therein.' This rule so charged has been well settled since the decision in the case of Childers v. State, 52 Ga. 106. It was applicable to the evidence and there was no error in so instructing the jury.

2. The charges on flight and on the rule relative to recent possession of stolen goods alleged to have been found in the hands of one charged with burglary were each correct in the abstract and were authorized by the evidence. There was no error in so charging for the reasons assigned.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The defendant, Homer Blakely, was tried and found guilty under an indictment for the felony of burglary. To the judgment of the trial court overruling his motion for a new trial, which contained the general and three special grounds, he excepts and assigns the same as error for the consideration of this court.

E A. Rusk, proprietor of the Rusk Motorcycle Company in Columbus, Georgia, was placed upon the witness stand by the State and testified that on October 21, 1946, his place of business was broken into and entered by burglars who cut a hasp on the back door thereof, and a safe containing $17,000.00 in cash and $13,000.00 in government bonds was stolen therefrom. [The burglars took the safe from his place of business and transported it in the car of the confessed accomplice Tillery 'out on the Sanford Road' and there broke into and extracted the money from it, leaving the safe in a creek.] Rusk identified a $10.00 bill which was exhibited to him, saying: 'The $10.00 bill that I hold in my hand was in my safe on the night my place was burglarized. I recognize it. I remember very distinctly this piece of yellow color at the end of the bill. I had wrapped it with some tape and the tape marks are on the bill now. I have pulled those tape marks off before and they do leave a slight mark on the bill. * * * I am identifying the bill by the colored spot of the scotch tape mark.' This bill, which was sent to this court with the record in a special exhibit is discolored by a yellowish-brown stain which appears on each side thereof at one end.

Ocle Newman, sworn for the State, testified: 'I heard about the Rusk Motorcycle Company being broken into and entered and on the day before that night I saw the defendant, Homer Blakely. * * * He said he wanted to see me that night. I saw him the next day. * * * We got in a car and road over to the Rusk Motorcycle Company. We got out of the car. He had informed me that he heard that the Rusk Motorcycle Company was going to be broken in by some people and we went over there to look at it. * * * He went around to the side. * * * Then we went across the river [from Columbus] and stopped somewhere around a drug store some place. He told me he was going to see somebody and I lay down in the back of the car. I didn't want to see who it was. He said he wanted us to see somebody, he didn't say who. * * * I was not looking. * * * I seen him later on in North Carolina at a little old tourist camp. I went up there with James Bush. Homer Blakely paid James Bush a little money, I think approximately $35.00. I don't remember the denomination. Homer [the defendant] had on him at that time a wallet with some money, a pretty good size long wallet. I couldn't tell whether there were any packages in it or not. * * *' The credibility of the witness was sought to be impeached by questioning him as to his prior conviction for burglary on cross-examination. The witness also testified: '[In North Carolina] there was nothing unusual about his [the defendant's] appearance and there was nothing unusual about his having some money in his wallet.'

When placed on the witness stand by the State, James Bush testified: 'On * * * the 22nd day of October, 1946, I made a trip up to Fayetteville, North Carolina. Newman went with me. While I was up there I met Homer. * * * We went into a store and Homer says, 'I owe you some money, James.' I says, 'Yes.' He says, 'I want to pay some of it. How much is it?' I says, 'I don't remember the exact amount,' and he says, 'Here is $35.00.' This $10.00 bill was in my possession when the police picked me up. I had $754.00 in my possession. Homer could have give me this as well as anybody else could have. I couldn't swear. I am not going to tell a lie. * * * I stated to [the Solicitor General] that Homer gave me this $10.00 bill, but I was in jail and you know I wanted to get out. * * * I had borrowed $700.00 from Ed Revells. I had it in my pocket. * * * And I had $19.00 of my own personal money and $35.00 Homer gave me. I am not going to say Ed gave it to me or Homer gave it to me, or who. I might have told Mr. Ed [the Solicitor General] that, but I was in jail and wanted out. It was a little tough when you get down there and they tell you they are going to put you in the penitentiary and you know you ain't done it. Homer had a big pack of bills and he undone them and gave me $35.00 out of the bills. They had something around the end of them, tape or rubber or something around the edge of them. It could have been printers tape. He had a package of money about like that. * * * That is not the first time I have seen bills stuck together like that. I do it myself and have seen other people do it. There wasn't anything unusual about that.'

Lamar Tillery, a confessed accomplice, testified: 'On * * * the 21st day of October, 1946, I saw Homer Blakely, the defendant on trial. I had a conversation with him on that day concerning the robbery of the Rusk Motorcycle Company. He came to my house twice; one time concerning the robbery of Rusk Motorcycle company and the other to sell some narcotics. He borrowed my automobile and said he was going after a safe. When he got it he came back to my house and picked me up. * * * We went out on the Sanford Road and busted into the safe. * * * After the money was taken out it was put in the automobile and I was given approximately $3,500.00 and some change. They taken the rest and went on with it. Buddy Earhart, myself, Homer Blakely and his girl. * * * We threw the safe in Uchee Creek. They told me they got the safe by going through the side entrance and backing the automobile out and rolling the safe and putting it in the automobile. The government bonds were destroyed and throwed in the creek. * * * I am under a two year sentence in the United States Public Service Hospital. * * * I understand that there is nobody there at the hospital except morphine addicts and people who take other forms of dope. * * * I have been addicted to the use of morphine for several years.'

P. E. Shoffeitt, of Auburn, Alabama, testified that he was a toxicologist with the State [Alabama] Department of Toxicology and with the Department of Criminal Investigation of Alabama. The witness' qualifications were admitted by counsel for the defendant. He then testified that he made an examination of the trunk compartment of the car of Tillery [the accomplice] and found there paint flakes which were compared with the paint on the safe and that in his opinion the safe taken from the Rusk Motorcycle Company had been hauled in the trunk of Tillery's automobile.

T. H. Slay of the Phenix City, Alabama, police department testified: 'I was requested to find Homer Blakely and arrest him. I went everywhere I thought he might be. I knew where his daddy lived. I went out there and looked for him. I was unable to find him. I do not know the date on which I was instructed to look for him. I think it was about three days after the burglary. Three days before we got the arrest order. * * * I know Homer Blakely. I don't know where Homer lived. I knew where his father lived, but I don't know whether he was living with his father or not.' Another officer testified that $3,500.00 had been recovered from Lamar Tillery, the confessed accomplice.

The defendant, in his statement to the jury, said: 'I am not guilty of what they have got me charged with. As far as going out wherever this place is--motorcycle shop--I haven't been anywhere with this Newman boy. I * * * barely know him. * * * As far as having him in my car, I have not; and I haven't had any money--any of the rest of the money in my possession at no time. The reason for me to leave here, I had a fight with my brother-in-law down in lower Girard, front of a cafe down there, and he threatened to kill me, and I come over and told Sheriff Matthews about it. And my sister was ill during the time and I decided it was best to leave where I wouldn't worry her. As far as having any connection with any burglary or anything, I haven't had anything to do with it.' The defendant introduced other evidence in order to prove an alibi. He also placed another witness Richard Lamar Earhart, who had plead guilty to having participated in the burglary in question, on the witness stand. Earhart testified that the defendant had nothing to do with the robbery and that he and Tillery were the only ones who participated in it. A. G. Reese, placed on the stand in rebuttal by the State, testified: I know Buddy Earhart. * * * I had him arrested. * * *...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT