Bland v. Bird

Decision Date19 February 1910
Citation134 Ga. 74,67 S.E. 427
PartiesBLAND v. BIRD et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

(Syllabus by the Court.)

1. Appeal and Error (§ 784*)—Dismissal-Grounds—Defects in Lower Court.

Where, in the certificate of the trial judge to the bill of exceptions, it is erroneously ordered that the clerk transmit a copy of the record specified in the bill of exceptions to the Court of Appeals, instead of to this court, which latter court has jurisdiction of the case, and the Court of Appeals has by proper order dismissed the case from its files and transmitted the bill of exceptions and record to this court, on the docket of which it has been entered, a motiqn to dismiss the bill of exceptions because of such error in the certificate will be denied. Dawson v. State, 130 Ga. 127, 60 S. E. 315.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. § 3126; Dec. Dig. § 784.*]

2. Costs (§ 278*)—Pleading (§§ 299, 111*)— Verification—Failure to Pay Costs of Former Suit—Burden of Proof.

Where a suit was nonsuited, a renewal thereof before the payment of the costs of the first suit, or the filing of an affidavit stating the inability o€ the plaintiff to pay such costs, affords good ground for abating the.second suit. Johnson v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 119 Ga. 185. 45 S. E. 988; Wright v. Jett, 120 Ga. 995, 48 S. E. 345; Board of Education of Tennille v. Kelley, 126 Ga. 479, 55 S. E. 238.

(a) Where, at the appearance term of the second suit, such plea in abatement was filed, without being sworn to, by the defendants, and no objection was made to the plea at such term, when the plaintiff made objection to the plea at a subsequent term, because it was not sworn to by defendants, the court committed no error in allowing defendants to cure the omission by making an affidavit swearing to the truth of the statements in the plea. Norton v. Scruggs, 108 Ga. 802, 34 S. E. 166; Green v. Hambrick, 118 Ga. 569, 45 S. E. 420; Rodgers v. Caldwell, 122 Ga. 279, 50 S. E. 95.

(b) The burden was upon the defendant to sustain such plea by proof; and a direction of a verdict in favor of the defendant upon such plea will be held to be error, where it does not appear from the record that there was anything before the court showing the truth of the statements in the plea.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Costs, Cent. Dig. § 1048; Dec. Dig. § 278;* Pleading, Cent. Dig. § 891; Dec. Dig. §§ 299, 111.*] Error from Superior Court, Bulloch County; B. T. Rawlings, Judge.

Action between V. J. Bland and D. E. Bird and others. From the judgment, Bland brings error. Reversed.

J. J. E. Anderson and G. S. Johnston, for plaintiff in error.

Brannen & Booth and H. B. Strange, for defendants in error.

HOLDEN, J. Judgment reversed. All the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Bland v. Bird
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 19, 1910

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT