Bland v. Viking Fire Protection, Inc. of the Southeast
| Citation | 454 So.2d 763 |
| Decision Date | 24 August 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-2241,83-2241 |
| Parties | Charles B. BLAND, d/b/a Southeast Mechanical Services, Appellant, v. VIKING FIRE PROTECTION, INC. OF THE SOUTHEAST, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Stephen F. Baker, Winter Haven, for appellant.
Norman Stallings, Jr. of Hill, Hill & Dickenson, Tampa, for appellee.
Charles Bland appeals the order denying his motion to vacate the final judgment entered upon a default. We reverse.
It is well established that under appropriate circumstances courts should liberally set aside defaults so that lawsuits may be determined on their merits. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962). A party seeking to vacate a default judgment must first demonstrate that the failure to file a responsive pleading was the result of excusable neglect and that there exists a meritorious defense. Brandt v. Dolman, 421 So.2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Lacore v. Giralda Bake Shop, Inc., 407 So.2d 275 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Travelers Insurance Co. v. Bryson, 341 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Here, the secretary's misfiling of the summons and complaint constituted excusable neglect. See County National Bank of North Miami Beach v. Sheridan, Inc., 403 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Associated Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Imperatori, 338 So.2d 74 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). See also Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Wright, 342 So.2d 503 (Fla.1977) ; Imperial Industries, Inc. v. Moore Pipe & Sprinkler Co., 261 So.2d 540 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Travelers Insurance Co. v. Bryson; North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber. Additionally, appellant states a meritorious defense in his answer and sworn affidavit by claiming that he had no contractual dealing of any kind with appellee and that he has never done business as Southeast Mechanical Services.
Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and the default and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
ALLSTATE FLORIDIAN INS. v. RONCO INVENT.
...on their merits. Lindell Motors, Inc. v. Morgan, 727 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (citing Bland v. Viking Fire Protection, Inc. of the Southeast, 454 So.2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)). The troublesome nature of our review here is the admittedly high "gross abuse of discretion" standard. ......
-
Okeechobee Imports, Inc. v. American Sav. and Loan Ass'n of Florida
...v. Thomas, 515 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Fortune Ins. Co. v. Sanchez, 490 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Bland v. Viking Fire Protection, Inc., 454 So.2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); County Nat'l Bank v. Sheridan, Inc., 403 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Associated Medical Inst., Inc. v. Impe......
-
Wien v. Quayside Realty, Inc., 84-1688
...cast by Florida's established and salutary policy in favor of determining cases on their merits, Bland v. Viking Fire Protection, Inc. of the Southeast, 454 So.2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Burbank v. Southland Corp., 345 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), it is clear that the trial court incorre......
-
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Haynie
...merits." Lindell Motors, Inc. v. Morgan, 727 So. 2d 1112, 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (citing Bland v. Viking Fire Prot., Inc. of the S.E., 454 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)). "[I]f there b[e] any reasonable doubt in the matter [of vacating a default], it should be resolved in favor of granting......