Blankenship v. State, 40276
Decision Date | 08 November 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 40276,40276 |
Citation | 308 S.E.2d 369,251 Ga. 621 |
Parties | BLANKENSHIP v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Penny J. Haas, John W. Hendrix, Savannah, for Roy Willard blankenship.
Spencer Lawton, Dist. Atty., Savannah, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Staff Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
This is the second appearance of this death penalty case. In its first appearance, the defendant's convictions for the offenses of murder, rape and aggravated sodomy were affirmed. The conviction for burglary was reversed because we found it to have merged with the felony murder conviction. Because of error under Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968), the death penalty was set aside and the case remanded for retrial on the issue of sentence. Blankenship v. State, 247 Ga. 590, 277 S.E.2d 505 (1981). On retrial, the defendant was again sentenced to death. The case is here on direct appeal and for mandatory review of the sentence. The issue here is the scope of evidence admissible in mitigation and whether the limitations imposed on Blankenship were permissible. We find he was impermissibly restricted; therefore, we reverse.
Evidence presented at the original trial was summarized in our prior opinion. Briefly, it showed that the victim, a seventy-eight year old woman in ill health, was raped and beaten by an intruder and subsequently died from heart failure brought on by the trauma. In our review of the evidence, we noted the unexplained presence of blood, which was neither the victim's nor the defendant's, in the fingernail scrapings taken from the victim's left hand. We noted also that a segment of Negroid hair was discovered in combings taken from the victim's pubic hair, for the presence of which a plausible, though not conclusive, explanation was offered by the state. We concluded, from our review of the evidence, including footprint and fingerprint evidence and the defendant's confession, that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions. However, in our review of the evidence, it was not necessary to determine, nor did we, that the evidence left no doubt as to the possible involvement of a third party.
The errors committed during the retrial had their genesis in, and are illustrated by, the following colloquy which occurred just prior to the presentation of the evidence:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chaney v. Brown, 83-1862
...may not have personally killed the victims, and that he may not have been present when they were killed. See Blankenship v. State, 251 Ga. 621, 308 S.E.2d 369, 371 (1983) (Lockett and Eddings require that defendant be allowed to offer as mitigating evidence in sentencing phase testimony tha......
-
Spivey v. State
...rulings in this regard. Relying on the broad scope of evidence admissible at the sentencing phase of trial (see Blankenship v. State, 251 Ga. 621, 308 S.E.2d 369 (1983); Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208, 305 S.E.2d 93 (1983)), Spivey contends that if this material was inadmissible at the guilt-......
-
Felker v. State
...the jury could consider evidence presented during the guilt phase of the trial. This enumeration is meritless. Blankenship v. State, 251 Ga. 621, 308 S.E.2d 369 (1983). 18. Appellant was allowed to present the testimony of a political science professor, two professors of religion, and a Pre......
-
State v. Biegenwald
...See State v. Jeffers, 135 Ariz. 404, 661 P.2d 1105, cert. den., 464 U.S. 865, 104 S.Ct. 199, 78 L.Ed.2d 174 (1983); Blankenship v. State, 251 Ga. 621, 308 S.E.2d 369 (1983); State v. Teague, 680 S.W.2d 785 Numerous questions may arise on resentencing, questions that are best answered initia......
-
Death Penalty Law - Therese Michelle Day
...Ga. 206, 210, 327 S.E.2d 168, 173 (1985)); see also Romine v. State, 256 Ga. 521, 528, 350 S.E.2d 446, 453 (1986); Blankenship v. State, 251 Ga. 621, 624, 308 S.E.2d 369, 371 (1983). 68. Martin, 284 Ga. at 508, 668 S.E.2d at 688-89. 69. Id. 70. Id. (citing O.C.G.A. Sec. 17-10-30(b)(2), (b)(......