Blanks v. State, No. 58318

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
Writing for the CourtROBERTSON; ROY NOBLE LEE; PITTMAN
Citation542 So.2d 222
PartiesBoots C. (Buddy) BLANKS v. STATE of Mississippi.
Docket NumberNo. 58318
Decision Date15 March 1989

Page 222

542 So.2d 222
Boots C. (Buddy) BLANKS
v.
STATE of Mississippi.
No. 58318.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
March 15, 1989.

Samuel H. Wilkins, Jackson, for appellant.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by Deirdre D. McCrory, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

En Banc.

ROBERTSON, Justice, for the Court:

If the desire to kill and the opportunity to kill came always together, who would escape hanging?

Mark Twain, Following the Equator.

I.

Today's appeal presents the plea of a disabled Vietnam veteran who has been found guilty of shooting two unarmed men with whom he had feuded following a chase of several miles. Defendant does not deny loading and firing his gun, claiming only that he acted to defend himself from his victims' attempt to run him down with a truck. A jury in a changed venue heard it all and returned guilty verdicts of murder and aggravated assault. We affirm.

II. 1

Boots C. (Buddy) Blanks, 58 years old, has lived in Monticello, Mississippi, for eight years. He is married to the former Helen Dickey and has two sons, Robert, age 18, and Howard, age 16. Blanks is retired from the Army, having spent ten years on active duty and sixteen years in the Reserves. When he retired he had ascended to the rank of Major. While Blanks was on active duty, he served in combat in Korea and in Vietnam, where he served as a combat company commander with the Army Special Forces. During his last tour of duty he was severely wounded, necessitating the amputation of his right arm above the elbow. Altogether, Blanks had an exemplary military career and was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the Silver Star, the Bronze Star, the Combat Infantry Badge (twice), and, of course,

Page 223

the Purple Heart. He has in recent years been employed as a public relations consultant by a company which manufactures artificial limbs.

Blank's wife Helen had inherited from her father a great deal of property located in Lawrence County, most of it within the Monticello city limits. The land is mainly cropland which the Blankses have leased to local farmers. There are also two houses on the land, located approximately 300 feet apart and connected by a circular driveway. In the summer of 1986 Buddy Blanks was separated from his wife, living with his son Robert at the smaller guest house. His wife and younger son were living in the main house.

Jimmy Selman, a farmer, thirty-eight years old, is a life-long resident of Monticello. Selman and his brother, through their agricultural partnership, had leased the Blankses' arable land for three years, ending after the 1985 harvest. Although Selman's lease was actually with Helen Blanks, who held title to the land, her husband had much to say regarding Selman's management of the cropland. Buddy Blanks often criticized Selman's farming methods; berated Selman's drivers for speeding on his property; and expressed disappointment at his family's share of the gross. The friction in the relationship resulted in a complete failure to agree on a rental contract for the 1986 season.

In the spring of 1986 Buddy Blanks had telephoned Selman a number of times, demanding that Selman return certain keys given to Selman to allow him access to the fields. Selman returned all of the copies of the keys that he could find to Helen Blanks, but he could not account for all of them. The tensions and animosities between Buddy Blanks and Jimmy Selman simmered in the sun as the summer of 1986 approached.

Saturday, June 14, 1986, began as a day of pastoral pursuits in Monticello. Buddy and Helen Blanks attended a Little League baseball game in which their son Howard was playing. Jimmy Selman worked in his fields harvesting wheat until mid-afternoon. He then went to a friend's house on the Pearl River where a fish-fry was being held. At the fish-fry Selman met his best friend, Danny Ford Ready, who he had known all of his life. Ready occasionally helped Selman in his farming operations on his days off from a local paper company. Selman and Ready left the fish-fry in Selman's one-ton flatbed Ford truck, taking a cooler of beer with them. They first went to a baseball game, staying only fifteen or twenty minutes.

After leaving the baseball game and while on their way to another friend's house, Ready and Selman decided to pay a visit to Buddy Blanks, though it was late at night. Apparently, Blanks had been criticizing the quality of Selman's farming operation rather publicly, and this had come to Selman's attention. Selman's purpose in going to Blanks' house was to "tell him if he had anything else to say about this bad deal he got, to tell me to my face and not be out here in public talking about it or whatever."

Selman knew that Blanks was separated from his wife and was staying at the guest house on the Blanks property. The two men arrived at approximately 10:30 p.m. Although Blanks' car was not in the driveway, Selman stopped because he thought he saw a light in the house. In fact, Blanks was at his wife's house in the backyard "cooking out".

As Selman backed his truck into the driveway, one corner of the flatbed struck and became entangled in a fence post. Selman tried to drive forward, but the wheels of the truck spun in the gravel driveway. He then caused the truck to lurch backwards and forwards a number of times in an effort to disengage the post from the rear of the truck. During this procedure, the bed of the truck struck a post supporting the porch of the house, knocking the post down. Unknown to Selman or Ready, Buddy Blanks, having been alerted to their presence by the sound of spinning tires in the gravel driveway, watched from the porch of his wife's house. After freeing the truck, and having seen no one, Selman assumed that Blanks was not home, so he and Ready drove off.

Page 224

Selman and Ready proceeded west on Bogue Chitto Avenue, a two-lane road, away from town. Blanks immediately gave chase in his new Chevrolet Caprice. He soon caught up with the slower-moving truck.

Selman and Ready were unaware of Blanks' pursuit until they saw Blanks' car pass the truck as it was traveling west on Bogue Chitto Avenue. They had only traveled a short distance and were still within the Monticello city limits. Selman immediately recognized the car as belonging to Blanks and, knowing that Blanks would be angry, had no desire to stop and talk with him. After the Caprice had passed the truck, it swerved in front of the truck and slowed, its brake lights flashing. Selman was unable to stop the large vehicle and it struck the rear bumper of the Caprice, damaging its right rear quarter-panel. The truck then edged into the left-hand lane and attempted to pass the Caprice, momentarily inching ahead of it. The Caprice, however, accelerated and the two vehicles proceeded west, side by side, on Bogue Chitto Avenue. Selman estimated their speed at forty to forty-five miles per hour.

The Caprice began to overtake the truck. Finally, the pursuing car outside his window. Ready shouted "there he is!" When Selman turned to respond to Ready, he heard gunfire and saw a number of muzzle flashes through the passenger window of the truck cab. Selman ducked and immediately applied the brakes, stopping the truck in the middle of the road. He looked up and observed Buddy Blanks' Caprice sideways across the road, blocking both traffic lanes. When he saw the door of the Caprice begin to open, Selman at once placed the truck in reverse, backed into a driveway, and sped away heading east on Bogue Chitto Avenue back toward town. As he drove off, he heard more gunfire.

At this time, Ready was slumped across the seat of the truck with his head in Selman's lap. Selman told him that it was safe to get up as they were out of range. Ready did not respond. Selman immediately drove to the local hospital. Danny Ford Ready died soon afterward. He is survived by his wife, son, and two step-daughters.

In all, the Selman truck had been hit by at least five bullets. Two bullet marks were found in the rear bumper area of the truck. Three bullets had entered the cab of the truck, all from the passenger side. One had entered through the open passenger's window, striking Danny Ford Ready behind the right ear. Two bullets entered the cab through the passenger side door, one striking Selman in the forearm, the other (presumably) exiting the cab through Selman's open window.

Buddy Blanks tells a different story of the events on Bogue Chitto Avenue. He says he acted in self-defense. Blanks admits that he overtook the truck as it headed west on Bogue Chitto Avenue, swerving in front of it and then applying his brakes in an attempt to stop the vehicle. Blanks claimed that the truck then sped up and rammed the rear of his Caprice two or three times before both vehicles came to a stop. He testified that after stopping his car, he reached under his seat and retrieved his 9-millimeter automatic pistol, which he kept in his car to shoot troublesome beavers. As he left his vehicle and walked toward the truck, with gun in hand, the driver of the truck attempted to run him over. Blanks stepped back and fired his pistol at the oncoming truck. He stated that he continued to shoot until the gun was out of ammunition. After the truck had driven off, Blanks returned home, had his son Howard reload his weapon, and instructed his wife to call the police.

Officer Donnie Mullins of the Monticello Police Department soon arrived and Blanks showed him the damage to his car. Mullins questioned Blanks about the gunfire but he was interrupted by a radio call requesting him to go to the hospital. He related...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 practice notes
  • Winder v. State, Nos. 89-KA-00911
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 30 Junio 1994
    ...with procedures for a duly-convicted felon to seek judicial relief had no validity unless this Court "accepted" them. In Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222 (Miss.1989), we held that a criminal statute authorizing multi-count indictments, Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 99-7-2 (Supp.1988) "although addressi......
  • Windham v. State, No. 07-KA-59619
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 20 Mayo 1992
    ...State, 140 Miss. 889, 895, 105 So. 742, 743 (1925), though we (sometimes) gag at "but for an instant" instructions. See Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222, 227 (Miss.1989) (citing cases); and particularly, the first appeal in this case, Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123, 126 (Miss.1987). We sense......
  • Tran v. State, No. 92-KA-01058-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 22 Agosto 1996
    ...(8 S. & M.) 401 (Miss.1847)). "Definitionally, we regard 'malice aforethought' and 'deliberate design' as synonymous." Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222, 227 (Miss.1989) (citing Fairman v. State, 513 So.2d 910, 913 (Miss.1987); Johnson v. State, 475 So.2d 1136, 1139 (Miss.1985); Lancaster v. S......
  • Williams v. State, No. 95-CT-01199-SCT.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 10 Diciembre 1998
    ...jury might reasonably have concluded that the defendant acted in the heat of passion, we will ... ordinarily reverse." Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222, 227 (Miss.1989) However, in Nicolaou v. State, 534 So.2d 168 (Miss.1988), this Court held that giving the "deliberate design" instruction an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
50 cases
  • Winder v. State, Nos. 89-KA-00911
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 30 Junio 1994
    ...with procedures for a duly-convicted felon to seek judicial relief had no validity unless this Court "accepted" them. In Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222 (Miss.1989), we held that a criminal statute authorizing multi-count indictments, Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 99-7-2 (Supp.1988) "although addressi......
  • Windham v. State, No. 07-KA-59619
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 20 Mayo 1992
    ...State, 140 Miss. 889, 895, 105 So. 742, 743 (1925), though we (sometimes) gag at "but for an instant" instructions. See Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222, 227 (Miss.1989) (citing cases); and particularly, the first appeal in this case, Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123, 126 (Miss.1987). We sense......
  • Tran v. State, No. 92-KA-01058-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 22 Agosto 1996
    ...(8 S. & M.) 401 (Miss.1847)). "Definitionally, we regard 'malice aforethought' and 'deliberate design' as synonymous." Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222, 227 (Miss.1989) (citing Fairman v. State, 513 So.2d 910, 913 (Miss.1987); Johnson v. State, 475 So.2d 1136, 1139 (Miss.1985); Lancaster v. S......
  • Williams v. State, No. 95-CT-01199-SCT.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 10 Diciembre 1998
    ...jury might reasonably have concluded that the defendant acted in the heat of passion, we will ... ordinarily reverse." Blanks v. State, 542 So.2d 222, 227 (Miss.1989) However, in Nicolaou v. State, 534 So.2d 168 (Miss.1988), this Court held that giving the "deliberate design" instruction an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT