Bleidt v. 555, Inc., 5--6123
Decision Date | 15 January 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 5--6123,5--6123 |
Citation | 253 Ark. 766,489 S.W.2d 235 |
Parties | , 11 UCC Rep.Serv. 1258 Valena BLEIDT, Appellant, v. 555, INC., Appellee. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Boyett & Morgan, by Denny P. Petty, Searcy, for appellant.
Glenn F. Walther and Eichenbaum, Scott, Miller, Crockett & Bryant, Little Rock, for appellee.
Valena Bleidt appeals from an order holding that an open account owed by H.L.B. Enterprises, Inc. was protected by a security agreement. Mrs. Bleidt, a lien creditor of H.L.B. Enterprises, Inc. also complains of the allowance of an attorney's fee based in part upon the open account.
The record shows that January 9, 1970, H.L.B. Enterprises, Inc. executed an installment note in the principal amount of $10,000 payable to 555 Inc. The security agreement executed in ocnnection with the note provides:
Appellant argues that under the terms of the Security agreement, the only thing secured is the unpaid balance of the note. We do not so construe the agreement. The phrase 'as hereinafter required' when used in connection with open account purchases, in our opinion, refers not only to the requirement that the inventory be maintained at not less than the unpaid balance of the note but also to the requirement...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morris, In re, 79-1053
...Court erred in holding that under Arkansas law the sales contracts' provisions for attorney fees are valid. But see Bleidt v. 555, Inc., 253 Ark. 766, 489 S.W.2d 235 (1973). The District Court is entitled to deference on matters of the law of the state where it sits. In this situation it se......
- American Television Co., Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, 5--6083