Blevens v. City of Manchester
Decision Date | 28 April 1961 |
Citation | 103 N.H. 284,170 A.2d 121 |
Parties | Clarence G. BLEVENS et al. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Emile R. Bussiere, Manchester (by brief and orally), for plaintiffs.
J. Francis Roche, City Sol., Manchester (by brief and orally), for defendant.
The power of the State to pass enabling legislation permitting municipal ordinances to regulate the subdivision of land has been sustained generally as a proper exercise of the police power. Anno. 11 A.L.R.2d 524; Webster, Urban Planning and Municipal Public Policy, ch. 9 (1958); Note, Land Subdivision Control, 65 Harv. L.Rev. 1226 (1952). 'Since the subdivision of a large tract of land into a number of small building lots and the development thereof, either for residential or industrial purposes increases the value of the land in the aggregate to the subdivider and at the same time imposes new burdens upon the municipality and, if uncontrolled, upon other elements in the community, the validity of imposing a duty upon the subdivider to comply with reasonable conditions relating to location, site plan, location of and width of roads and sidewalks, the installation of necessary storm drains and sewers, and to restrictions on lot sizes so that the subdivision will conform to the local requirements for the safety, health and general welfare of the subsequent owners of the individual lots therein and of the community has been generally recognized.' 2 Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning, ch. 71, § 9 (1960).
Statutes, like RSA 36:19-36:29, regulating the subdivision of land seek to promote the orderly and planned growth of relatively undeveloped areas within a municipality. Brous v. Smith, 304 N.Y. 164, 106 N.E.2d 503; Rhyne, Municipal Law 32-60 (1957); Reps, Control of Land Subdivision by Municipal Plainning Boards, 40 Cornell L. Q. 258 (1955). Planless growth and haphazard development accentuate municipal problems in the demand for streets, water and sanitary services which have a direct relation to traffic safety and health. 6 Powell, Real Property, § 866 (1958); Town of Stoneham v. Savelo, Mass., 170 N.E.2d 417; State ex rel. Jack v. Russell, 162 Ohio St. 281, 123 N.E.2d 261; Petterson v. City of Naperville, 9 Ill.2d 233, 137 N.E.2d 371. The subdivision of land has a definite economic impact upon the municipality and hence the regulation of subdivision activities has been sustained as a means by which the interests of the public and the general taxpayer may be safeguarded and protected. Since the subdivider of land creates the need for local improvements which are of special benefit to the subdivision it is considered reasonable that he should bear the cost rather than the municipality and the general taxpayer. Haar, Land-Use Planning, 347-351 (1959); Zastrow v. Village of Brown Deer, 9 Wis.2d 100, 100 N.W.2d 359; Comment, 1961 Wis.L.Rev. 310, 312; Village of Lynbrook v. Cadoo, 252 N.Y. 308, 314, 169 N.E. 394.
The plaintiffs' contention that 'the police power is not involved' in this litigation cannot be accepted. The fact that the lot areas may be satisfactory to the subdivider and prospective purchasers, or that the streets and drainage are also satisfactory to them does not bar the application of the subdivision statute and the ordinance enacted pursuant to it. Note, An Analysis of Subdivision Control Legislation, 28 Ind.L.J. 544 (1953). Bettman, City and Regional Planning Papers 74 (1946).
The plaintiffs' basic contention is that the subdivision law and the ordinance enacted pursuant thereto are 'retrospective laws' forbidden by N.H.Const., Pt. I, Art. 23rd. The pertinent part of RSA 36:27 reads as follows: 'Whoever, being the owner or agent of the owner of any land located within a subdivision, transfers or sells or agrees to sell or negotiates to sell any land by reference to, or exhibition of, or by other use of, a plat of a subdivision, before such plat has been approved by the planning board and recorded or filed in the office of the appropriate register of deeds shall forfeit and pay a penalty of one hundred dollars for each lot or parcel so transferred or sold or agreed or negotiated to be sold * * *.'
The subdivision law and ordinance apply to all of the plaintiffs' lots shown on their recorded maps which are unsold and any conveyed after the subdivision ordinance was approved by the city. This is not a retrospective law. Lake Intervale Homes, Inc. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills, 28 N.J. 423, 147 A.2d 28; Opinion of the Justices, 101 N.H. 515, 131 A.2d 49; City of Rochester v. Barcomb, 103 N.H. ----, 169 A.2d 281; Pepin v. Beaulieu, 102 N.H. 84, 89, 151 A.2d 230. 'It is admitted that most of the petitioners' streets have not been formally accepted by the city of Manchester.' See RSA 230:1; Harrington v. Manchester, 76 N.H. 347, 350, 82 A. 716; Wason v. Nashua, 85 N.H. 192, 155 A. 681. The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crownhill Homes, Inc. v. City of San Antonio
...Wis.2d 100, 100 N.W.2d 359 (1960); Rounds v. Board of Water and Sewer Commissioners, 347 Mass. 40, 196 N.E.2d 209; Blevens v. City of Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121; Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem, 234 N.C. 708, 68 S.E.2d 838 (1952). The Board's regulations in question require that......
-
Piper v. Meredith
...intended to promote the attractiveness of roadside scenery. Opinion of the Justices, 103 N.H. 268, 270, 169 A.2d 762; Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 289, 170 A.2d 121; 6 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, s. 24.03 (1969 Rev.Vol.). 'It is a long established principle under law that tow......
-
Hickory Point Partnership v. Anne Arundel County
...with recorded plats contrary to certain minimum area requirements of a subsequently enacted zoning ordinance); Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121 (1961) (the fact that a subdivider has recorded plats approved under a prior statute does not give rise to vested rights exempting......
-
Spring Valley Development, In re
...of the subsequent owners of the individual lots therein and of the community has been generally recognized." Blevens v. City of Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121, 122 (1961). The Court 'The subdivision of land has a definite economic impact upon the municipality and hence the regulatio......