Blevins v. State
Decision Date | 29 August 1978 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 83 |
Citation | 364 So.2d 388 |
Parties | James BLEVINS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Breland, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Morgan County, Alabama, denying appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He was in custody of the Sheriff of Morgan County under a rendition warrant issued by Honorable George C. Wallace, Governor of Alabama, at the request of Honorable Dolph Briscoe, Governor of Texas.
The rendition warrant recites that appellant is charged by Transcript in the County of Harris in said State, with the crime of murder with malice (1) and escaped from lawful custody. The rendition warrant fails to comply with the requirements of Section 15-9-33, Code 1975. It is necessary for the issuance of a warrant in such cases that the accused is "lawfully charged by indictment or by an information filed by a prosecuting officer and supported by affidavit as to the facts, or by affidavit made before a magistrate in that state, with having committed a crime under the laws of that state, or that he has been convicted of crime in that state and has escaped from confinement or Broken his parole." (Emphasis supplied). Beasley v. State, 43 Ala.App. 247, 187 So.2d 806; Watson v. State, 30 Ala.App. 184, 2 So.2d 470; Smith v. State, 45 Ala.App. 125, 226 So.2d 668; Lofton v. State, 46 Ala.App. 229, 239 So.2d 901.
The return of the Sheriff recites:
When the rendition warrant is defective, as here, and there are allied papers in evidence, we look to them to determine their legal sufficiency to justify the issuance of the rendition warrant. Aldio v. State, 44 Ala.App. 303, 208 So.2d 212; Lofton v. State, Supra; Harris v. State, 257 Ala. 3, 60 So.2d 266; Tyner v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 346 So.2d 493, certiorari denied, Ala., 346 So.2d 496.
The allied papers attached to the Sheriff's return, and which were introduced into evidence, include the following:
1. A certified copy of the judgment of conviction of petitioner, and another, of murder with malice (1) and a sentence of 99 years in the Texas State Penitentiary.
2. A duly certified mandate from the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas affirming appellant's conviction on June 15, 1962.
3. A Certificate of Parole from the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles issued to appellant under date of July 3, 1972.
4. A copy of the Parole Agreement signed by appellant on July 6, 1972, in which he agreed to all the terms and conditions of a parole from the Texas State Penitentiary.
5. A Waiver of Extradition signed by appellant in which he agreed that if he violated any of the terms and conditions of his parole he would voluntarily return to the Texas State Penitentiary and that he would not in any manner contest any effort by the State of Texas to return him to that State to serve the remainder of his sentence.
6. A State Warrant issued by the Texas Department of Corrections for the arrest of appellant for violating the terms of his parole which parole was revoked on February 10, 1975, and stating that appellant's unexpired sentence is 77 years, 11 months and 24 days.
7. Application for requisition to the Governor of Texas, signed by the Assistant Warden of the Texas Department of Corrections, stating that appellant was a parole violator and was in custody of the Sheriff of Morgan County, Alabama, and had refused to waive extradition, which application was properly certified by the Presiding Judge of the County Court and attesting to the genuine signature of the Assistant Warden. This document was also signed by the County Clerk attesting to the genuine signature of the Presiding Judge of said County Court.
8. A State Warrant issued by the Board of Pardons and Paroles for the arrest of appellant for parole violation issued on February 10,...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Brown v. State
- Peraita v. State
-
Thigpen v. Smith
... ... 238, 603 F. Supp. 1523 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), reduced petitioner's sentence of death to life imprisonment. Thigpen v. State, 50 Ala. App. 176, 277 So.2d 922, 926 (1973). It appears from the language in that opinion ("the sentence is reduced to life imprisonment") that ... ...
- Clark v. State, 1 Div. 619