Block v. Insurance Co.

Citation12 S.W. 702,52 Ark. 340
PartiesBLOCK v. INSURANCE CO
Decision Date14 December 1889
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

On motion to assess 10 per cent. damages against the sureties on the supersedeas bond of appellants.

For the facts and original opinion in this case, see ante p. 201. Secs. 1311, 1312 Mansf. Dig., are as follows:

"Sec. 1311. Upon the affirmance of a judgment, order or decree for the payment of money, the collection of which, in whole or in part, has been superseded, as provided in this chapter, 10 per centum damages on the amount superseded shall be awarded against the appellant."

"Sec. 1312. Upon the affirmance of any judgment, order or decree bye the Supreme Court, which has been wholly or in part superseded, judgment shall be rendered and entered up against the securities on the supersedeas bond, and the court shall award execution thereon."

Motion denied.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

No judgment was rendered against the appellants for the recovery of money in the Circuit Court, or here. The sureties are not liable, therefore, to pay the penalty prescribed by the statute. Stephens v. Shannon, 44 Ark. 178; Worth v. Smith, 44 Ky. 504, 5 B. Mon. 504; Graham v. Swigert, 7 B. Mon. 661.

Motion denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Mayo v. Mayo
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1906
    ...of the delay. 63 Ark. 405; 70 Ark. 185. 3. The decree of the probate court allotting dower and homestead cannot be collaterally attacked. 52 Ark. 340; 49 Ark. 397; Ark. 423; 50 Ark. 188; 55 Ark. 37; 57 Ark. 49; 55 Ark. 398; Kirby's Digest, § § 4424, 4425, and notes. See also 63 Ark. 513; 80......
  • Rhodes v. Driver
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 2, 1901
    ...§ 392; 98 Mich. 218; 19 Neb. 444; 28 Neb. 103; 44 N.W. 90; 64 Ind. 493; 15 Wash. 346; 63 Ia. 715; 96 Mo. 56; 14 Ga. 162; 44 Ark. 178; 52 Ark. 340; 37 Ark. Chancery will not use injunction as a means of trying title to public office, but will leave the claimant to his remedies at law. 2 High......
  • Smith v. Lee
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1904
    ...J. D. Block and N.W. Norton, for appellants. The court erred in refusing the second declaration of law asked by appellants. 44 Ark. 178; 52 Ark. 340. No judgment for value of the lumber could have been entered on the interplea. 53 Ark. 133. The suit in conversion, though afterwards dismisse......
  • Mountain Park Terminal Railway Co. v. Field
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1905
    ...at law the only proper issues were the value of the land and the damages to the owner from taking same. Kirby's Dig. §§ 2947, 2952, 2955; 52 Ark. 340; 81 Mo. 135; 45 Ark. 280; 105 Ill. 511; 38 18; 13 Mo.App. 32; 43 Ark. 120; 42 Neb. 327; 3 Ore. 95. For statutes of other States allowing othe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT