Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.

Decision Date30 April 2009
Docket NumberNo. 08CA0134.,08CA0134.
Citation224 P.3d 301
PartiesAndrew BLOOD and Carrie Blood, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. QWEST SERVICES CORPORATION and Qwest Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Public Service Company of Colorado, d/b/a Xcel Energy, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • Qwest Serv. Corp.. v. Blood
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • June 20, 2011
    ...condition. Upon review, the court of appeals upheld the majority of the award in the published opinion of Blood v. Qwest Services Corporation, 224 P.3d 301 (Colo.App.2009). Qwest sought certiorari review in this Court seeking a new trial on all issues and a reversal of the judgments in favo......
  • Giduck v. Niblett
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 2014
    ...Lake, Harrison, Warrington, and McAleer under C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) ; however, we may affirm on other grounds. See Blood v. Qwest Servs. Corp., 224 P.3d 301, 329 (Colo.App.2009) (court of appeals may affirm "on any ground supported by the record").* Sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice un......
  • Jackson v. Unocal Corp., No. 09CA0610.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • July 23, 2009
    ...standard or its independent analysis of the C.R.C.P. 23 predominance requirement using those new findings. Cf. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp., 224 P.3d 301, 336 (Colo.App. 2009) (requiring trial court on remand to conduct independent analysis of constitutionality of exemplary damages award b......
  • Perfect Place, Ltd. v. Semler
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 2016
    ...mistake, we need not address whether the court properly found Quail Street and Watson to be alter egos. See Blood v. Qwest Servs. Corp. , 224 P.3d 301, 329 (Colo. App. 2009) (noting that the court of appeals can affirm on any grounds supported by the record).D. Deed Voided by Fraud¶ 54 Perf......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 6 - § 6.8 • MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Courtroom Handbook for Civil Trials (CBA) Chapter 6 Conduct of Trial
    • Invalid date
    ...order on other occasions, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial. Blood v. Qwest Servs. Corp., 224 P.3d 301, 320-21 (Colo. App. 2009), aff'd on other grounds, 252 P.3d 1071 (Colo. 2011). ➢ Grounds for Mistrial — Misconduct of Counsel. When an attorney ......
  • Chapter 6 - § 6.8 MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Courtroom Handbook for Civil Trials (2022 ed.) (CBA) Chapter 6 Conduct of Trial
    • Invalid date
    ...order on other occasions, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial. Blood v. Qwest Servs. Corp., 224 P.3d 301, 320-21 (Colo. App. 2009), aff'd on other grounds, 252 P.3d 1071 (Colo. 2011). ➢ Grounds for Mistrial — Misconduct of Counsel. When an attorney ......
  • Chapter 2 - § 2.7 APPELLATE REVIEW
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Courtroom Handbook for Civil Trials (2022 ed.) (CBA) Chapter 2 Motions In Limine
    • Invalid date
    ...of an in limine order warrants a new trial only if the violation is clear and sufficiently prejudicial. Blood v. Qwest Servs. Corp., 224 P.3d 301, 320 (Colo. App. 2009), aff'd, 252 P.3d 1071 (Colo. 2011). This is particularly true if the party who objects to the admissibility of the evidenc......
  • Chapter 9 - § 9.5 • REMEDIES
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Civil Claims: Elements; Defenses and Sample Pleadings (CBA) Chapter 9 Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Invalid date
    ...the plaintiff establishes prima facie proof of a triable issue. C.R.S. § 13-21-102(1.5)(a).[119] See, e.g., Blood v. Qwest Servs. Corp., 224 P.3d 301, 314-17 (Colo. App. 2009) (evidence supported exemplary damages award which was not excessive or disproportionate); Byrne, 916 P.2d at 573 (e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT