Bloomer v. Shauger

Decision Date02 May 2013
Citation967 N.Y.S.2d 322,989 N.E.2d 560,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 03121,21 N.Y.3d 917
PartiesRobert BLOOMER, Appellant, v. Christine M. SHAUGER, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

21 N.Y.3d 917
989 N.E.2d 560
967 N.Y.S.2d 322
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 03121

Robert BLOOMER, Appellant,
v.
Christine M. SHAUGER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York.

May 2, 2013.



Rusk, Wadlin, Heppner & Martuscello, L.L.P., Kingston (John G. Rusk of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of Theresa J. Puleo, Syracuse (P. David Twichell of counsel), for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT
MEMORANDUM.

[989 N.E.2d 560]The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs and the certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary.

[21 N.Y.3d 918]Plaintiff's hand was injured because, while plaintiff was holding the halter of defendant's horse, the horse jerked her head back. According to plaintiff, the horse was reacting to an attempt by defendant to put a lead line on the horse.

Under the rule of Bard v. Jahnke, 6 N.Y.3d 592, 815 N.Y.S.2d 16, 848 N.E.2d 463 (2006), plaintiff cannot recover in the absence of a showing that defendant had knowledge of the animal's “vicious propensity” or “propensity to do any act that might endanger the safety of the persons and property of others” (6 N.Y.3d at 596–597, 815 N.Y.S.2d 16, 848 N.E.2d 463, quoting Collier v. Zambito, 1 N.Y.3d 444, 446, 775 N.Y.S.2d 205, 807 N.E.2d 254 [2004] ). No such showing was made here. A tendency to shy away when a person reaches for a horse's throat or face is, as the record shows, a trait typical of horses. The Appellate Division correctly held that a vicious propensity cannot consist of “behavior that is normal or typical for the particular type of animal in question” ( Bloomer v. Shauger, 94 A.D.3d 1273, 1275, 942 N.Y.S.2d 277 [2012] ).

Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary, in a memorandum.

[989 N.E.2d 561]

[967 N.Y.S.2d 323]

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and RIVERA concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT