Blue v. State
| Decision Date | 27 December 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 01-96-00771-CR.,01-96-00771-CR. |
| Citation | 64 S.W.3d 672 |
| Parties | Benjamin Leon BLUE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Randolph Earl Roll, Kristine C. Woldy, Houston, for Appellant.
Alan Curry, Assistant District Attorney, Houston, for the State.
Panel consists of Justices MIRABAL, NUCHIA, and RADACK.
OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
A jury found appellant, Benjamin Leon Blue, guilty of aggravated assault on a public servant. The jury assessed punishment at confinement for 10 years and a fine of $3,000. In the original appeal, we affirmed. Blue v. State, 983 S.W.2d 811 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998) (en banc), rev'd, 41 S.W.3d 129 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000).
The Court of Criminal Appeals granted appellant's petition for discretionary review solely to determine whether we erred in holding that, by his failure to object, appellant failed to preserve his complaints about the trial judge's comments to members of the venire at the beginning of the jury selection process. Blue, 41 S.W.3d at 129-30. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed our judgment and remanded the case to us, presumably for a harm analysis. Id. at 133. In a four-judge opinion (two judges having concurred in the judgment only, and three judges having dissented), the court stated as follows:
The comments of the trial judge, which tainted appellant's presumption of innocence in front of the venire, were fundamental error of constitutional dimension and required no objection.
Rule 44.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states as follows:
44.2 Reversible Error in Criminal cases
(a) Constitutional Error. If the appellate record in a criminal case reveals constitutional error that is subject to harmless error review, the court of appeals must reverse a judgment of conviction or punishment unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction or punishment.
Tex.R.App. P. 44.2(a). In the present case, the trial judge told the members of the venire, prior to the start of voir dire, that the delay in beginning trial was due to appellant's negotiations with the prosecutor in an attempt to reach a plea bargain. Further, during voir dire, the trial judge indicated to the venire that, in deciding whether to have a defendant take the stand to testify, defense counsel may decide to put his client on the stand even if he is guilty.2
Appellant took the stand in the present case and gave testimony that directly contradicted the testimony of the State's witnesses. The main issue in this case was whether appellant knew the person he assaulted was a police officer at the time of the assault. Appellant testified that he did not know he was scuffling with a police officer. If the jury had believed appellant, it would have acquitted him.
The trial judge's comments...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Proenza v. State
...the above preferred procedure for error preservation. SeeUnkart,400 S.W.3d at 99. And being guided by Judge Keasler's concurrence in Blue v. Stateand the First Court of Appeals' reasoning in Jaenicke v. State,we have concluded that a defendant may complain for the first time on appeal about......
-
Mason v. State
...did a harm analysis, found that Blue had been harmed, and remanded the case to the trial court. Blue v. State, 64 S.W.3d 672, 672-73 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd) (op. on Finding a fundamental error of constitutional dimension, I cannot say beyond a reasonable doubt that t......
-
State v. Guo
... ... On July 20, 1999, the police again searched the briefcase in an effort to "better ascertain ownership of the briefcase." In addition to Guo's expired driver's license, the police found numerous index cards with names on them, a blue folder, a clipboard, and a green ledger. The green ledger contained the name, Francis Maglalang. Maglalang was the victim in a 1998 rape, and the police had already noted several similarities between her case and the case for which Guo was under investigation. After discovering Maglalang's name in ... ...
-
Miles v. State
...the venire that tainted the presumption of innocence, adversely affecting appellant's right to a fair trial." 64 S.W.3d 672, 673 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd). The First Court had originally affirmed the trial court in an en banc opinion, citing the defendant's failure to ......
-
Error Preservation and Appeal
...is needed to preserve this claim for appellate review. [ Blue v. State , 41 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000), rev’d on remand , 64 S.W.3d 672 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001) (trial judge’s multiple comments that tainted the presumption of innocence warranted reversal even in the absenc......
-
Table of cases
...State , 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 7532 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2006), §9:73 Blue v. State , 41 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000), rev’d on remand , 64 S.W.3d 672 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001), §11:51 Bluitt v. State , 137 S.W.3d 51 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004), §11:91 Booker v. State , 103 S.W.3d 521 ......
-
Error Preservation and Appeal
...is needed to preserve this claim for appellate review. [ Blue v. State , 41 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000), rev’d on remand , 64 S.W.3d 672 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001) (trial judge’s multiple comments that tainted the presumption of innocence warranted reversal even in the absenc......
-
Error Preservation and Appeal
...is needed to preserve this claim for appellate review. [ Blue v. State , 41 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000), rev’d on remand , 64 S.W.3d 672 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001) (trial judge’s multiple comments that tainted the presumption of innocence warranted reversal even in the absenc......