Board of Com'rs of Las Animas County v. People ex rel. McPherson

Decision Date08 January 1906
Citation36 Colo. 246,91 P. 36
PartiesBOARD OF COM'RS OF LAS ANIMAS COUNTY v. PEOPLE ex rel. McPHERSON.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Department 3. Error to District Court, Las Animas County; Jesse M. Northcutt, Judge.

Mandamus by the people, on the relation of Frank McPherson, against the board of county commissioners of Las Animas county. Writ granted, and defendant brings error. Dismissed.

Everett Bell and A. P. Anderson, for plaintiff in error.

Robert Bonynge, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

A complaint was filed in the district court of Las Animas county, reciting that a petition was filed with the board of county commissioners of said county praying for the establishment of an election precinct at Primero in said county, but that the county commissioners had refused to act, and praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the commissioners to establish an election precinct at said Primero. A demurrer to the complaint was filed and was overruled, and judgment entered granting the writ. The board of commissioners took the case to the Court of Appeals by writ of error.

We shall take judicial notice of the fact that there has been a precinct established at Primero in said county. It is not material whether the precinct was established upon proper petition or by virtue of authority so to do under the statute. There being no live question for us to determine, the cause should be dismissed.

Dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State ex rel. Gregory v. Boyd
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 19 d5 Fevereiro d5 1909
    ... ... 80, 53 N.E. 385; State, ... ex rel., v. Board, etc. (1899), 153 Ind. 302, ... 54 N.E. 809; ... 636, 59 S.E. 400; ... Board, etc., v. People, ex rel ... (1906), 36 Colo. 246, 91 P. 36; ... 649, 39 So. 214; Campbell v ... Shelby County (1906), 147 Ala. 703, 41 So. 407; ... Lindsey v ... ...
  • Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Cardwell
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 15 d5 Janeiro d5 1926
    ...Dean, 8 Idaho 344, 69 P. 62; Wilson v. Boise City, 7 Idaho 69, 60 P. 84; Roberts v. Kartzke, 18 Idaho 552, 111 P. 1; Las Animas County v. People, 36 Colo. 246, 91 P. 36; 2 High on Injunction, sec. The question of costs involved in the controversy does not change the general rule. Courts are......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT