Board of Commissioners of Vigo County v. Daily
| Citation | 31 N.E. 531,132 Ind. 73 |
| Decision Date | 07 June 1892 |
| Docket Number | 15,802 |
| Parties | The Board of Commissioners of Vigo County v. Daily |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Parke Circuit Court.
The judgment is reversed, with instructions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
I. N. Pierce, G. W. Faris and S. R. Hamill, for appellant.
J. E. Lamb, C. McNutt and J. G. McNutt, for appellee.
The appellee brought this action against the appellant to recover damages for a personal injury occasioned by the alleged negligence and carelessness of appellants, in the care and control of the court house of Vigo county.
Several errors have been assigned, and are discussed by counsel, but we regard the question of law presented by the ruling upon the demurrer to the complaint as decisive of the action.
It is now well settled that counties are involuntary corporations, organized as political subdivisions of the State for governmental purposes, and not liable, any more than the State would be liable, for the negligence of its agents or officers unless made liable by statute. White v. Board, etc., 129 Ind. 396, 28 N.E. 846; Smith v. Board, etc., 131 Ind. 116, 30 N.E. 949; Morris v. Board, etc., 131 Ind. 285, 31 N.E. 77; Abbett v. Board, etc., 114 Ind. 61; Board, etc., v. Boswell, 4 Ind.App. 133, 30 N.E. 534; Shepard v. Pulaski Co. (Ky.), 13 Ky. L. Rep. 672, 18 S.W. 15; Downing v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S.W. 264; Hite v. Whitley Co., 91 Ky. 168, 15 S.W. 57; Elliott Roads and Streets, 323.
There may be little distinction between the duties imposed upon boards of commissioners in the care and management of bridges, and of public buildings; but, while we regard the liability of counties for negligence in failing to keep bridges in repair as well settled, we recognize the fact that the weight of authority is the other way (Board, etc., v. Chipps, 131 Ind. 56; Elliott Roads and Streets, supra), and are not disposed to extend the rule so as to embrace other cases. Smith v. Board, supra; Green v. Harrison Co., 61 Iowa 311, 16 N.W. 136.
In our opinion the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.
The judgment is reversed, with instructions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Bd. of Com'rs of Hendricks Cnty. v. Bd. of Com'rs of Marion Cnty.
...573, 42 N. E. 206, 39 L. R. A. 58, and cases cited; Cones v. Board, etc., 137 Ind. 404, 37 N. E. 272, and cases cited; Board, etc., v. Dailey, 132 Ind. 73, 31 N. E. 531;Smith v. Board, 131 Ind. 116, 30 N. E. 949;Morris v. Board, etc., 131 Ind. 285, 31 N. E. 77;White v. Board, etc., 129 Ind.......
-
State ex rel. Bd. of Com'rs of Hendricks Cnty. v. Bd. of Com'rs of Marion Cnty.
...142 Ind. 573, 42 N. E. 206, 39 L. R. A. 58, and cases cited; Cones v. Board, 137 Ind. 404, 37 N. E. 272, and cases cited; Board v. Daily, 132 Ind. 73, 31 N. E. 531;Smith v. Board, 131 Ind. 116, 30 N. E. 949;Morris v. Board, 131 Ind. 285, 31 N. E. 77;White v. Board, 129 Ind. 396, 28 N. E. 84......
-
State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of County of Hendricks v. Board of Commissioners of County of Marion
... ... Cones v ... [85 N.E. 518] ... Board, etc. (1894), 137 Ind. 404, 37 N.E. 272, and ... cases cited; Board, etc., v. Daily (1892), ... 132 Ind. 73, 31 N.E. 531; Smith v. Board, ... etc. (1892), 131 Ind. 116, 30 N.E. 949; Morris ... v. Board, etc. (1892), 131 ... ...
-
Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
...the following: Cones v. Board, supra; Smith v. Board, 131 Ind. 116, 30 N. E. 949;Morris v. Board, 131 Ind. 285, 31 N. E. 77;Board v. Daily, 132 Ind. 73, 31 N. E. 531;Hollenbeck v. Winnebago Co., 95 Ill. 148;Templeton v. Linn Co., 22 Or. 313, 29 Pac. 795;Manuel v. Commissioners, 98 N. C. 9, ......