Green v. Harrison County

Decision Date13 June 1883
Citation16 N.W. 136,61 Iowa 311
PartiesGREEN v. HARRISON COUNTY
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Appeal from Harrison District Court.

THE petition states that the plaintiff was in possession of a tract of land on which there was growing a crop of corn, which was entirely destroyed by reason of an overflow of water from the Spooner ditch, which had been constructed by the authority and direction of the county. The negligence of the defendant, it was stated, consisted in permitting the accumulation of sediment in the ditch, which caused the overflow. It was stated that the defendant had actual and constructive notice of the obstructions in the ditch. The plaintiff sought to recover the value of the crop destroyed. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.

AFFIRMED.

S. H. Cochrane, for appellant.

J. W. Barnhart, for appellee.

OPINION

SEEVERS, J.

Against the decided weight of authority, it has been held in this state that counties are liable for damages caused by reason of the negligent construction and maintenance of county bridges. Wilson & Gustin v. Jefferson County, 13 Iowa 181. This case has been repeatedly followed, and probably will continue to be, unless the general assembly interferes and provides otherwise. Bridges are constructed for the benefit of the general public. The ditch in question was constructed more particularly for the benefit of abutting owners. The benefit to them was direct, while the general public is only remotely and incidentally affected. We are not disposed to extend to ditches the rule which has been held to apply to bridges. There is a clear distinction between the two. A court-house is constructed for the benefit of the whole county, but it has been held that, when a person received a personal injury because of its negligent construction, he cannot recover therefor of the county. Kincaid v. Hardin County, 53 Iowa 430, 5 N.W. 589. The case at bar falls within the rule, and is controlled by the case just cited.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • Shirkey v. Keokuk Cnty.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 26, 1937
    ...Davis County, 196 Iowa 183, 191 N.W. 129, 194 N.W. 245;Lane v. Dist. Tp. of Woodbury, 58 Iowa 462, 12 N.W. 478;Green v. Harrison County, 61 Iowa 311, 16 N.W. 136;Nutt v. Mills County, 61 Iowa 754, 16 N.W. 536;Lindley v. Polk County, 84 Iowa 308, 50 N.W. 975;Dashner v. Mills County, 88 Iowa ......
  • Shirkey v. Keokuk County
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 26, 1937
    ...-citing Soper v. Henry County, 26 Iowa 264; Kincaid v. Hardin County, 53 Iowa 430, 5 N.W. 589, 36 Am.Rep. 236; Green v. Harrison County, 61 Iowa 311, 16 N.W. 136; Lindley v. Polk County, 84 Iowa 308, 50 N.W. 975; Packard v. Voltz, 94 Iowa 277, 62 N.W. 757, 58 Am.St.Rep. 396; Wilson v. Wapel......
  • Hilgers v. Woodbury Cnty.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1925
    ...or employees. Soper v. Henry County, 26 Iowa, 264;Kincaid v. Hardin County, 53 Iowa, 430, 5 N. W. 589, 36 Am. Rep. 236;Green v. Harrison County, 61 Iowa, 311, 16 N. W. 136;Lindley v. Polk County, 84 Iowa, 308, 50 N. W. 975;Packard v. Volt, 94 Iowa, 277, 62 N. W. 757, 58 Am. St. Rep. 396;Wil......
  • Slutts v. Dana
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1908
    ...these county bonds. None of the numerous cases cited by appellee's counsel run counter to the views above expressed. Green v. Harrison County, 61 Iowa, 311, 16 N. W. 136, was a personal injury case, and is in no way in point, and the same may be said of Dashner v. Mills County, 88 Iowa, 401......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT