Board of Ed. of Hall County v. Shirley, 26448

Decision Date06 May 1971
Docket NumberNo. 26448,26448
Citation227 Ga. 565,181 S.E.2d 826
PartiesBOARD OF EDUCATION OF HALL COUNTY et al. v. Robert D. SHIRLEY et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Robinson, Buice, Harben & Strickland, Sam S. Harben, Jr., Perry S. Oliver, Palmour & Palmour, J. E. Palmour, Jr., Gainesville, for appellants.

Reed & Dunn, Gainesville, for appellees.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

ALMAND, Chief Justice.

The sole question raised in this appeal is: Where a trial judge sustains a motion of the defendant to dismiss or abate the complaint in case No. K-14,559, on the grounds of the pendency in case No. K-15,093, involving the same subject matter and parties, can the trial judge on the day following the entry of the order of dismissal and during the term in which the order was entered, amend such order to provide that the order of dismissal shall not operate as an adjudication of the merits of the second case '* * * and said dismissal of the second case is without prejudice to the plaintiffs. If they so desire, the plaintiffs are allowed to file a subsequent action'?

At the time the appellees filed their complaint on November 11, 1970, there was pending in the same court between the same parties and on the same cause of action, a complaint filed on April 14, 1970. The appellants filed a motion to dismiss the second suit on the ground of the pending of the first suit at the time the second suit was begun. Code § 3-601.

The court, on December 28, 1970, sustained this motion and dismissed the second suit. On the following day and during the same term of court the court amended this order as set out above.

The appellants filed their notice of appeal only as to the amendment of December 29, 1970, and error is enumerated only on this amendment.

The appllants insist that the order of dismissal of December 28 was unconditional and final and not subject to being amended.

We disagree. The superior court has the power on its own motion during the term in which an order or judgment is rendered, to revoke, alter, amend, or modify, such order or judgment. Deen v. Baxley State Bank, 192 Ga. 300, 15 S.E.2d 194; Dover v. Dover, 205 Ga. 241(1), 53 S.E.2d 492.

The cases of this court such as Adams v. Payne, 219 Ga. 638, 135 S.E.2d 423 and Pendergrass v. Duke, 147 Ga. 10, 92 S.E. 649, relied on by the appellants, do not involve the same question as in the instant case.

The court, in the amendment to the dismissal order, merely expressed in positive language, that the dismissal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Hopkins v. Garner & Glover Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 1998
    ...Moseley, 243 Ga. 858, 257 S.E.2d 278 (1979); Pekor v. Clark, 236 Ga. 457, 458(1), 224 S.E.2d 30 (1976); Bd. of Ed. of Hall County v. Shirley, 227 Ga. 565, 566, 181 S.E.2d 826 (1971); Hinson v. Hinson, 218 Ga. 447, 128 S.E.2d 487 (1962). When the term expired without a petition to amend bein......
  • Houston General Ins. Co. v. Stein Steel & Supply Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 11, 1975
    ...in which an order or judgment is rendered, to revoke, alter, amend, or modify, such order or judgment.' Board of Education of Hall County v. Shirley, 227 Ga. 565, 566, 181 S.E.2d 826. Accord: Vick v. Vick, 230 Ga. 36, 195 S.E.2d 6. The fact that Stein Steel filed an affidavit after the hear......
  • Camera Shop, Inc. v. G A F Corp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 26, 1973
    ...the power to revoke, alter, amend or modify an order or judgment during the term in which it is rendered. Board of Education of Hall County v. Shirley, 227 Ga. 565, 181 S.E.2d 826. See also Dover v. Dover, 205 Ga. 241, 53 S.E.2d 492; Barrett v. Manus, 219 Ga. 693, 135 S.E.2d 430; Thompson v......
  • Rothstein v. Brooks, 49639
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 1974
    ...to vacate it, with or without notice to the parties. Kimsey v. Caudell, 109 Ga.App. 271(2), 135 S.E.2d 903; Board of Eduaction of Hall County v. Shirley, 227 Ga. 565, 181 S.E.2d 826; Camera Shop, Inc. v. GAF Corp., 130 Ga.App. 88, 89, 202 S.E.2d 241. This rule applies under the Civil Practi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT