Board of Health of Covington v. Kollman
Decision Date | 09 December 1913 |
Citation | 156 Ky. 351 |
Parties | Board of Health of Covington, et al. v. Kollman. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Common Law & Equity Division).
STEPHENS L. BLAKELY for appellants.
ROBERT C. SIMMONS for appellee.
In the year 1909 the general council of the city of Covington enacted an ordinance covering the sale of milk and other dairy products and regulating the sanitary condition of dairies and milk depots and the condition and use of utensils, vehicles, etc., used in handling, manufacturing or sale of milk and dairy products in Covington, Kentucky, and repealing certain ordinances of the city of Covington. The ordinance conferred on the board of health powers of inspection and examination. It further provides as follows:
On January 31, 1912, the Board of Health of the city of Covington adopted the following rule:
Plaintiff, Henry Kollman, a dairyman engaged in the business of selling milk by retail in the city of Covington, refused to comply with the regulation of the board of health in regard to bottling his milk, and for this reason was refused a permit to sell milk in the city of Covington. Alleging that the regulation of the board of health with reference to the bottling of milk was invalid plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the board of health and its health officer from prosecuting him for selling milk without a permit, and to compel the board of health to issue him a permit.
The case being submitted on the pleadings, exhibits and agreed facts, plaintiff was granted the relief prayed for, and from the judgment so entered the board of health and J. M. O'Maley, its health officer, appeal.
It is the contention of plaintiff that the powers conferred on local boards of health do not authorize them to adopt a regulation of the character of the one in question, and that being true the board of health of the city of Covington, which was a mere administrative agent of the city, to look after the enforcement of the ordinance enacted by the general council, has no power to enact rules and regulations in addition to and inconsistent with the provisions of the ordinance under which it acts. In this connection it is pointed out that the ordinance in question is very comprehensive. It deals with every phase of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grant v. Leavell
...82 S.W.2d 283 259 Ky. 267 GRANT v. LEAVELL, Director of Health. Court of Appeals of KentuckyApril 19, 1935 ... generally. Board of Health of Covington v. Kollman, ... 156 Ky. 351, 160 S.W. 1052, 49 L ... ...