Board of Physician Quality Assur. v. Young

Decision Date01 September 1996
Docket NumberNo. 122,122
Citation697 A.2d 82,346 Md. 314
PartiesBOARD OF PHYSICIAN QUALITY ASSURANCE v. Henry A. YOUNG
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Motion to vacate.

Andrew H. Baida, C. Frederick Ryland, Cynthia J. Pelztman and Steven M. Sullivan, Baltimore, for Appellant.

John A. Austin and William C.C. Barnes, Towson, for Appellee.

Submitted to BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, RAKER and WILNER, JJ.

ORDER

Prior report: 111 Md.App. 721, 684 A.2d 17.

The Court having considered the motion to vacate the decision of the Court of Special Appeals filed by the petitioner and the response thereto in the above captioned case, it is this 24th day of July, 1997,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the motion be, and it is hereby, denied, and it is further

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition for a writ of certiorari having been improvidently granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Rouse-Fairwood Ltd. Partnership v. Supervisor of Assessments of Prince George's County
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1997
    ...Quality Assurance, 111 Md.App. 721, 726, 684 A.2d 17 (1996), cert. granted, 344 Md. 568, 688 A.2d 447, and cert. dismissed, 346 Md. 314, 697 A.2d 82 (1997). Consequently, if the Tax Court's decision is based on an interpretation of an ordinance or statute, we are not bound by the agency's i......
  • Dept. of Assessments v. N. BALT. CENTER
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • January 4, 2000
    ...Quality Assurance, 111 Md.App. 721, 726, 684 A.2d 17 (1996), cert. granted, 344 Md. 568, 688 A.2d 447, and cert. dismissed, 346 Md. 314, 697 A.2d 82 (1997). Consequently, if the Tax Court's decision is based on a question of law, we are not bound by the agency's interpretation. Department o......
  • AK'S v. MARYLAND SECURITIES
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 27, 2001
    ...Quality Assurance, 111 Md.App. 721, 726, 684 A.2d 17 (1996), cert. granted, 344 Md. 568, 688 A.2d 447, cert. dismissed, 346 Md. 314, 697 A.2d 82 (1997). In ascertaining the propriety of an agency's legal conclusions, we must consider whether the agency recognized and applied the correct pri......
  • Maryland State Highway Administration v. Engineering Management Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 25, 2002
    ...factual conclusions. Young v. Bd. of Physician Quality Assurance, 111 Md.App. 721, 725-27, 684 A.2d 17 (1996), cert. dismissed, 346 Md. 314, 697 A.2d 82 (1997). We owe no deference to agency conclusions based upon errors of law, to which the substituted judgment standard applies. State Ethi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT